
Research meta-data is typically recorded as a time series with dimensions of cross-sections (e.g., article title, journal, volume, issue, author’s names, and affiliations) and time (e.g., publication date). Meta-datasets provide valuable insights into the research trends in a particular field of science. Meta-analysis (a group of methods to analyze research meta-data) currently does not implement text analytics in either programming language. This package aims to fill that need. Arabica offers descriptive analytics, visualization, sentiment classification, and structural break analysis for exploratory analysis of research meta-datasets in easy-to-use Python implementation. The package operates on three main modules: (1) descriptive and time-series n-gram analysis provides a frequency summarization of the key topics in the meta-dataset, (2) visualization module displays key-term frequencies in a heatmap, line plot, and word cloud, (3) sentiment and structural breakpoint analysis evaluates sentiment from research article titles and identifies turning points in the sentiment of published research. It uses VADER [@Hutto:2014] and FinVADER [@finvader:2023], the updated model with financial lexicons, to classify sentiment. Clustering-based Fisher-Jenks algorithm [@Jenks:1977] finds break points in the data. The package has more general use for exploratory analysis of time-series text datasets, mainly in social sciences. In business economics, it improves customer satisfaction measurement through product reviews analysis. In politology and behavioral economics, it enables detailed text mining of social media interactions. Similarly, in finance, it simplifies financial sentiment analysis of news headlines.
sentiment analysis, data visualization, exploratory data analysis, text mining
sentiment analysis, data visualization, exploratory data analysis, text mining
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
