Downloads provided by UsageCounts
{"references": ["S. Oyama,T. Kokubo, and T. Ishida, Domain-Specific Web Search with Keyword Spices .EEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Eng.vol.16, no. 1, pp. 17-27, Jan. 2004.", "C.O.Kwok , O. Etzioni , and D.S. Weld, Scaling Question Answering to the Web, ACM Trans. Information Systems, vol. 19,no. 3, pp. 242-262, 2001.", "R.D. Burke, K.J. Hammond, V.A. Kulyukin, S.L. Lytinen, N.Tomuro, and S. Schoenber, Question Answering from Frequently-Asked Question Files Experiences with the FAQ Finder System, Technical Report TR-97-05, Univ.of Chicago, pp. 1-38,1997.", "C.H. Wu, J.F. Yeh, and M.J. Chen, Domain-Specific FAQ Retrieval\nUsing Independent Aspects, ACM Trans. Asian Language Information\nProcessing, vol. 4, no. 1, 2005.", "D. Camacho, \"Using Hierarchical Knowledge Structure to Implement\nDynamic FAQ System, Proc. Fifth Int-l Conf. Practical Aspects of\nKnowledge Management (PAKM -04), 2004.", "V. Jijkoun, J. Mur, and M. de Rijke, Information Extraction for Question\nAnswering: Improving Recall through Syntactic Patterns,Proc. Int-l Conf.\nComputational Linguistics, 2004.", "R. Soricut and E. Brill, Automatic Question Answering: Beyond the\nFactoid,\" Proc. Human Language Technology Conf., 2004.", "E. Sneiders, Automated Question Answering Using Question Templates\nthat Cover the Conceptual Model of the Database,Natural Language\nProcessing and Information Systems, Proc.Int-l Workshop Applications\nof Natural Language to Information Systems, pp. 235-239, 2002.", "Chung-Hsien Wu, Senior Member, IEEE, Jui-Feng Yeh, and Yu-Sheng\nLai, Semantic Segment Extraction and Matching for Internet FAQ\nRetrieval, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol.\n18, No. 7, July 2006\n[10] Zhou Qiang, Huang Changning\u00b4\u255d\u00eeAn Improved Approach for Chinese\nParsing Based on Local Preference Information\u00b4\u255d\u00eeJournal of Software\u00b4\u255d\u00ee\nVol.10\u00b4\u255d\u00eeNo.1\u00b4\u255d\u00eepp1-6\u00b4\u255d\u00ee1999\n[11] Qun Liu, Sujian LI .Word Similarity Computing Based on How-net.\nComputational Linguistics and Chinese Language\nProcessing,China(Taiwan), 2002(7): 59 \u00b4\u00a2\u00d7 76.\n[12] R. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto, Modern Information Retrieval.\nAddison-Wesley, 1999."]}
FAQ system can make user find answer to the problem that puzzles them. But now the research on Chinese FAQ system is still on the theoretical stage. This paper presents an approach to semantic inference for FAQ mining. To enhance the efficiency, a small pool of the candidate question-answering pairs retrieved from the system for the follow-up work according to the concept of the agriculture domain extracted from user input .Input queries or questions are converted into four parts, the question word segment (QWS), the verb segment (VS), the concept of agricultural areas segment (CS), the auxiliary segment (AS). A semantic matching method is presented to estimate the similarity between the semantic segments of the query and the questions in the pool of the candidate. A thesaurus constructed from the HowNet, a Chinese knowledge base, is adopted for word similarity measure in the matcher. The questions are classified into eleven intension categories using predefined question stemming keywords. For FAQ mining, given a query, the question part and answer part in an FAQ question-answer pair is matched with the input query, respectively. Finally, the probabilities estimated from these two parts are integrated and used to choose the most likely answer for the input query. These approaches are experimented on an agriculture FAQ system. Experimental results indicate that the proposed approach outperformed the FAQ-Finder system in agriculture FAQ retrieval.
Ontology., FAQ, Semantic Inference
Ontology., FAQ, Semantic Inference
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts