
Fig. 3.—Examples of upper molars of species included in the morphological cladistic analysis, upper molars unknown for Acrolophomys. A— LM1–3, UCMP 317400, from Ronez et al. (2020). B—RM1–3, reversed, FMNH 230688, photo by C. Ronez. C—LM1–3, MVZ 105624, photo by A. Pacheco-Castro. D—LM1–3, MNCN-275, photo by P. Peláz-Campomanes. E—LM1–3, USNM 272116, photo by R. Martin. F—LM1–3, USNM 272176, photo by R. Martin. G—RM1–3, reversed, MVZ 219614. H—RM1–3, reversed, MVZ 225121. I—RM1–3, reversed, MVZ 219161. Photos G, H, and I by Jessica L. Blois, UC Merced. All occlusal views. Not to scale, all M1s adjusted to equal lengths.
Published as part of Kelly, Thomas S, Martin, Robert A, Ronez, Christophe, Cañón, Carola & Pardiñas, Ulyses F J, 2023, Morphology and genetics of grasshopper mice revisited in a paleontological framework: reinstatement of Onychomyini (Rodentia, Cricetidae), pp. 3-28 in Journal of Mammalogy 104 (1) on page 7, DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyac093, http://zenodo.org/record/10831784
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
