Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Williams' Rule and Its Relevance for Positive Change Efforts

Authors: Wilson, David Sloan;

Williams' Rule and Its Relevance for Positive Change Efforts

Abstract

Abstract Nearly every individual and society seeks to work toward positive change, but these efforts often perversely result in dysfunctional outcomes, especially when different aspirations collide with each other. This is also true in nature, where adaptations that evolve by natural selection do not necessarily result in well-functioning animal societies and multispecies communities. A classic book on this subject is Adaptation and Natural Selection, published by George C. Williams in 1966. Williams forcefully asserted that adaptation at any level of a multitier hierarchy of units (e.g., individuals, single species social groups, or multispecies ecosystems) requires a process of selection at the same level and tends to be undermined by selection at lower levels. This can be called Williams’ Rule. While Williams’ Rule is widely appreciated by evolutionary biologists, it is little known in other topic domains, such as the human-related academic disciplines and pragmatic efforts to accomplish positive change. The purpose of this article is to make Williams’ Rule more widely known, which can improve any positive change effort, no matter what topic domain or scale.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Multilevel Selection, Williams' Rule, Generalized Darwinism, Cultural Evolution

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!