Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

SAbyNA D2.8 – Improvements required in existing models

Authors: Hanlon, James; Harrison, Sam; Salmatonidis, Apostolos;

SAbyNA D2.8 – Improvements required in existing models

Abstract

In this H2020 SAbyNA deliverable, we discuss improvements required in existing release, fate and exposure models, with a particular focus on improvements that could be made to GUIDEnano. This deliverable dated October 2021 is an interim and acts as a progress report for Task 2.2. It is recommended to access the more complete report including results of improvements, available on Zenodo as Deliverable 2.4 (October 2022) under DOI 10.5281/zenodo.10822229. We report on our detailed assessment of environmental release, fate and exposure models, focussing on aspects such as processes and algorithms, input parameters, sensitivity/uncertainty analyses and scenarios/case studies. We identify a number of potential improvements to GUIDEnano, such as the inclusion of default parameter sets, updated processes algorithms, and the inclusion of results from sensitivity/uncertainty analyses performed on other exposure models. We discuss the progress to date for the improvements required in the human exposure models following on from M2.2. The improvements identified in MS2.2 included model assumptions, input parameters, algorithms and processes, uncertainty analysis and the inclusion of release rates. The main focus of our assessment to date has been in uncertainty analysis and we are currently developing methodology to improve the uncertainty analysis of the models. We also present the results to date and the work to be performed for the other improvements identified over the next year. The results of improvements required in both environmental and human models are presented in Deliverable 2.4 in October 2022 (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.10822229).

Keywords

FOS: Nanotechnology, nanoparticle, GUIDEnano, assessment, environmental exposure, SbD, human exposure, engineered nanomaterial, models, SSbD, Nanotechnology, environmental fate, Safe(r) by Design, environmental release

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Funded by