Downloads provided by UsageCounts
{"references": ["D. A. McFarlane, \"Personal Knowledge Management (PKM): Are We\nReally Ready?\", Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, vol. 12,\nno. 3, 2011.", "S. Ismail, M. S. Ahmad, \"Emergence of Social Intelligence in Social\nNetwork: A Quantitative Analysis for Agent-mediated PKM Processes\",\nin Proc. of the ICIMu 2011 Conference, Malaysia, 2011.", "J. Grundspenkis, \"Agent based approach for organization and personal\nknowledge modelling: Knowledge management perspective\", Journal of\nIntelligent Manufacturing, vol. 18, 2007, pp 451-457.", "H. Jarche, \"PKM in 2010\", Life in Perpetual Beta. 2010.", "H. Jarche, \"Sense-Making with PKM\", Life in Perpetual Beta. 2009.", "J. Martin, \"Personal Knowledge Management\", Managing Knowledge:\nCase Studies in Innovation. Edmonton: Spotted Cow Press. 2000.", "S. Avery, R. Brooks, J. Brown, P. Dorsey, M. O- Connor, \"Personal\nknowledge management: framework for integration and partnerships\", in\nProc. of the Association of Small Computer Users in Education\nConference, 2001, pp. 29-39.", "M. C. Pettenati, E. Cigognini, J. Mangione, E. Guerin, \"Using social\nsoftware for personal knowledge management in formal online\nlearning\", Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 8, 2007,\npp. 52-65.", "L. Razmerita, K. Kirchner, F. Sudzina, \"Personal knowledge\nmanagement: The role of Web 2.0 tools for managing knowledge at\nindividual and organisational levels\", Online Information Review, vol.\n33, 2009, pp. 1021-1039.\n[10] I. Nonaka, H. Takeuchi, H. The knowledge creating company: How\nJapanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York:\nOxford University Press, 1995.\n[11] E. M. Awad, H. M. Ghaziri, Knowledge Management. New Jersey:\nPearson Education Ltd., 2004.\n[12] Y. Malhotra, \"Why Knowledge Management Systems Fail? - Enablers\nand Constraints of Knowledge Management in Human Enterprises\", in\nC.W. Holsapple, Handbook on Knowledge Management, Heidelberg:\nSpringer-Verlag, 2002.\n[13] J. D. Mayer, \"A Framework for the Classification of Personality\nComponents\", Journal of Personality, vol. 64, no. 4, Durham: Duke\nUniversity Press, 1995, pp. 819-878.\n[14] S. Ismail, M. S. Ahmad, \"Emergence of Personal Knowledge\nManagement Processes within Multi-agent Roles\", in D. Richards and\nB.H. Kang (Eds.): PKAW 2012, LNAI 7457, Berlin: Springer, 2012, pp.\n221-228.\n[15] M.H. Coen, SodaBot: A Software Agent Construction System,\nCambridge, MA: MIIT AI Laboratory, 1991.\n[16] S. Russel, P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach,\nEnglewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1995.\n[17] D. Gilbert, M. Aparicio, B. Atkinson, S. Brady, et al., IBM Intelligent\nAgent Strategy, 1995.\n[18] P. Maes, \"Artificial Life Meets Entertainment: Life like Autonomous\nAgents\", Communications of the ACM, vol. 38, 1995, pp. 108-114.\n[19] N.R. Jennings, P. Faratin, A.R. Lomuscio, S. Parsons, C. Sierra, M.\nWooldridge, \"Automated Negotiation: Prospects, Methods and\nChallenges\", International Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation,\n2000, pp. 1-30.\n[20] G. Ali, N.A. Shaikh, A.W. Shaikh, \"A Research Survey of Software\nAgents and Implementation Issues in Vulnerability Assessment and\nSocial Profiling Models\", Australian Journal of Basic and Applied\nSciences, vol. 4, 2010, pp. 442-449."]}
This paper presents an analytical framework for an effective online personal knowledge management (PKM) of knowledge workers. The development of this framework is prompted by our qualitative research on the PKM processes and cognitive enablers of knowledge workers in eight organisations selected from three main industries in Malaysia. This multiple-case research identifies the relationships between the effectiveness of four online PKM processes: get/retrieve, understand/analyse, share, and connect. It also establishes the importance of cognitive enablers that mediate this relationship, namely, method, identify, decide and drive. Qualitative analysis is presented as the findings, supported by the preceded quantitative analysis on an exploratory questionnaire survey.
organisational knowledge management, personal knowledge management, software agent technology., Bottom-up approach, knowledge organisation
organisational knowledge management, personal knowledge management, software agent technology., Bottom-up approach, knowledge organisation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 12 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts