Downloads provided by UsageCounts
{"references": ["Sackett D.L., Rosenberg W.M., Gray J.A., Haynes R.B., Richardson\nW.S., \"Evidence-Based Medicine: what it is and what it isn-t\n\"(editorial). BMJ. 196; 312 (7023) 71-72 (www.pubmed.com)W.-K.\nChen, Linear Networks and Systems (Book style). Belmont, CA:\nWadsworth, 1993, pp. 123-135.", "Inmon W.H., \"Building the Data Warehouse\", Second Edition, J.Wiley\nand Sons, New York, 1996.", "Shams K., Farishta M. ; \"Data Warehousing: Towards knowledge\nmanagement\", Top Health Inf Manage. 2001 Feb, 21 (3): 24-32,\n(PubMed - indexed by MEDLINE)", "Abidi S.S.R., Abidi S.R., \"A Case of Supplementing Evidence Base\nMedicine with Inductive Clinical Knowledge: Towards Technology\nEnriched Integrated Clinical Evidence System\", 14th IEEE Symposium\non Computer-Based Medical Systems, (CBMS-2001), 26-27 July 2001,\nBethesda (USA)", "Frawley W., Piatetsky-Shapiro G. and Matheus C., \"Knowledge\nDiscovery in Databases: An Overview\", AI Magazine, Fall 1992, pgs\n213-228.", "Schuerenberg B. K., \"Clearing the Hurdles to Decision Support\", Health\nData Management, May 2003.", "Roeden N. et al., \"Clinical Pathways\", Medizincontrolling/DRG\nResearch Group, Universit\u251c\u00f1tsklinikum M\u251c\u255dnster,\nhttp://drg.unimuenster.de/de/behandlungspfade/cpathways_reisebericht.\nhtml", "Wu R., Peters W., Morgan M.W., \"The next generation of clinical\ndecision support: linking evidence to best practice\", J Healthc Inf Manag\n2002 Fall;16(4):50-5.", "Craig J.C., Irwing L.M., Stockler M.R., \"Evidence-based medicine:\nuseful tools for decision making\", The Medical Journal of Australia\n(http://www.mja.com.au), MJA 2001; 174:248-253M. Young, The\nTechincal Writers Handbook. Mill Valley, CA: University Science,\n1989.\n[10] Stolba N., Banek M. and Tjoa A M., \"The Security Issue of Federated\nData Warehouse in the Area of Evidence-Based Medicine\", ARES 2006,\nThe First International Conference on Availability, Reliability and\nSecurity, April 20.-22. 2006, Vienna, submitted for publication\n[11] Health Informatics Research (HIR) group, School of Computing and IT,\nUniversity of Western Sydney, (http://www.cit.uws.edu.au/hir/)\n[12] Open Clinical, \"Knowledge Management for medical care\",\nhttp://www.openclinical.org/clinicalpathways.html\n[13] Lin F., Chou S., Pan S., Chen Y., \"Mining Time Dependency Patterns in\nClinical Pathways\", 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System\nSciences, Jan 4-7 2000 Page(s):8 pp. vol.1, IEEE CNF"]}
Evidence-based medicine is a new direction in modern healthcare. Its task is to prevent, diagnose and medicate diseases using medical evidence. Medical data about a large patient population is analyzed to perform healthcare management and medical research. In order to obtain the best evidence for a given disease, external clinical expertise as well as internal clinical experience must be available to the healthcare practitioners at right time and in the right manner. External evidence-based knowledge can not be applied directly to the patient without adjusting it to the patient-s health condition. We propose a data warehouse based approach as a suitable solution for the integration of external evidence-based data sources into the existing clinical information system and data mining techniques for finding appropriate therapy for a given patient and a given disease. Through integration of data warehousing, OLAP and data mining techniques in the healthcare area, an easy to use decision support platform, which supports decision making process of care givers and clinical managers, is built. We present three case studies, which show, that a clinical data warehouse that facilitates evidence-based medicine is a reliable, powerful and user-friendly platform for strategic decision making, which has a great relevance for the practice and acceptance of evidence-based medicine.
decision-support systems, evidence-based medicine., data mining, data warehousing
decision-support systems, evidence-based medicine., data mining, data warehousing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 4 | |
| downloads | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts