
This comment addresses the taxonomic dispute over the priority and validity of Neospathodus bevelledi (Leu et al., 2022), in relation to Neospathodus yangtzeensis (Lyu et al., 2023). We refute the junior synonym claim made by Wu et al. (2024) based on the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) guidelines, highlight the formal publication and ZooBank registration of Ns. bevelledi and propose future nomenclatural corrections and biostratigraphic zone renaming. The initial mention of Ns. bevelledi in Leu's (2021) doctoral dissertation is acknowledged as an early indication of the species concept.
Conodont, Smithian, Early Triassic, Ns. bevelledi, Neospathodus
Conodont, Smithian, Early Triassic, Ns. bevelledi, Neospathodus
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
