Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Event . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Event . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Event . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Workshop: Defining Criteria for Assessing PID Policies and Services

Authors: van Horik, Rene; Nordling, Josefine; van Lieshout, Natascha; Marjamaa-Mankinen, Liisa; Lager, Lassi; Hugo, Wim; Davidson, Joy;

Workshop: Defining Criteria for Assessing PID Policies and Services

Abstract

Workshop Defining the criteria for assessing PID Policies and Services Date: Monday, February 19th, 2024 / 09:00-12:00 / Edinburgh / IDCC Conference Workshop description: PIDs are a key component of the FAIR data principles. A wide range of policies and services exist to manage and create PIDs in the research ecosystem. How can the characteristics of PID policies and PID services be assessed? This is the central issue of this workshop. The workshop, organised by the FAIR-IMPACT project, aims to support the adoption of FAIR-enabling services and technology, such as PID-related core components developed by the FAIRCORE4EOSC project. In the workshop we present and discuss ways to assess the compliance of PID policies. We present the FAIRCORE4EOSC approach to assess PID compliance and we draft ideas on support for this that FAIR-IMPACT can provide. The workshop is relevant for PID service providers, PID managers, PID owners and PID policy makers. Goal of the workshop: Introduction of a compliance assessment method to determine the characteristics of Persistent Identifier policies and services. Program of the workshop: Workshop agenda Time Topic Presenter 09:00 - 09:10 Welcoming words & introduction to the FAIR-IMPACT project Josefine Nordling, CSC (Persistent Identifier WP lead) 09:10 - 09:20 Setting the scene - PIDs & the EOSC context Josefine Nordling, CSC 09:20 - 09:50 The PID landscape René van Horik, DANS (PID policy task lead) 09:50 - 10:20 Mentimeter discussion on PID policies René van Horik & Josefine Nordling 10:20 - 10:40 Break 10:40 - 10:55 Introducing the Compliance Assessment Toolkit & assignment of group work Natascha van Lieshout, SURF (PID implementation programme task lead) 10:55 - 11:25 Assessing Compliance: A Tale of Two Service Providers Activity 11:25 - 11:45 Feeding back from groups on PID policy criteria Joy Davidson, DCC (Engagement, Adoption & Implementation WP lead) & Josefine Nordling (CSC) 11:45 - 11:50 FAIR-IMPACT Open Call Joy Davidson, DCC 11:50 - 12:00 Conclusion & next steps René van Horik, DANS Workshop materials: 1. "0240219 IDCC workshop Defining Criteria for Assessing PID Policies and Services.pdf" Slides used during the workshop 2. "Mentimeter results PID policies.pdf" During the workshop a Mentimeter was used to get input from the attendees on several issues 3. "Form - Compliance Assessment of PID service providers.pdf" This form provides a list of criteria to assess the compliance of PID services. Attendees are asked to fill in the form by assessing two fictious PID policies that are available online (the URL of the PID policies is provided in one of the slides) 4. "Actors in the PID ecosystem.pdf" This document describes the main actors in the PID ecosystem (and that are assessed by the CAT) by comparing PIDs with vehicle licence plates as identifiers.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities