Downloads provided by UsageCounts
{"references": ["Ku, Ho, \"An e-Voting schema against Bribe and Coercion,\" in\nProoceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on e-\nTechnology, e-Commerce and e-Service, Taipei, 2004.", "\"Report of the National Workshop on Internet Voting: Issues and\nResearch Agenda,\" Internet Policy Institute, Maryland, 2001.", "M. Stadler, J.M. Piveteau, and J. Carmenisch, \"Fair blind signatures,\"\nAdvances in Cryptology - Eurocrypt '95, St.Malo, 1995, pp. 209-219.", "Benaloh. \"Verifiable Secret-Ballot Elections,\" Ph.D. Thesis, Yale\nUniversity, New Haven, 1996.", "D. Chaum. \"Untraceable Electronic Mail, Return Addresses, and\nDigital Pseudonyms,\" Communications of the ACM, vol. 24, no. 2,\n1981, pp. 84-88.", "M. Abe, F. Hoshino. \"Remarks on Mix-Networks Based on\nPermutation Networks,\" presented at the PKC 2001, Cheju Island,\nKorea.", "D. Boneh, P. Golle. \"Almost Entirely Correct Mixing With\nApplications to Voting,\" presented at the 9th ACM-CCS Conference,\nWashington, USA, 2002.", "J. Furukawa, K. Sako. \"An Efficient schema for Proving a Shuffle,\"\npresented at the CRYPTO 2001, Santa Barbara, USA.", "P. Golle et al., \"Optimistic mixing for Exit-Polls,\" presented at the\nAsiacrypt 2002, Queenstown, New Zealand.\n[10] M. Jakobsson, A. Juels, R.L. Rivest. \"Making Mix Nets Robust for\nElectronic Voting by Randomized Partial Checking,\" presented at the\nUSENIX Security Symposium, San Francisco, USA, 2002.\n[11] O. Baudron et al., \"Practical Multi-Candidate Election system,\"\npresented at the PODC 2001, Rhode Island, USA.\n[12] R. Cramer et al., \"A Secure and Optimally Efficient Multi-\nAuthorityElection schema,\" presented at the Eurocrypt 1997,\nKonstanz, Germany.\n[13] P. Fouque et al., \"Sharing Decryption in the Context of Voting or\nLotteries,\" presented at the Financial Cryptography 2000, Anguilla,\nBritish West Indies.\n[14] B. Schoenmakers. \"A Simple Publicly Verifiable Secret Sharing\nschema and its Applications to Electronic Voting,\" presented at the\nCrypto 1999, Santa Barbara, USA.\n[15] G. Dini, \"A Secure and available electronic voting service for a largescale\ndistributed system,\" Future Generation Computer Systems, vol.\n19, 2002, pp. 69-85.\n[16] C.-C. Chang, W.-B. Wu. \"A secure voting system on a public\nnetwork,\" Networks, vol. 29, no. 2, 1997, pp. 81-87.\n[17] D. Chaum. \"Elections with unconditionally secrets ballots and\ndisruption equivalent to breaking RSA,\" Proceedings of Eurocrypt'88,\nDavos, Switzerland, 1988, pp. 177-182.\n[18] J.D. Cohen, M.J. Fischer. \"A robust and verifiable cryptographically\nsecure election schema,\" Proceedings of the 26th IEEE Annual\nSymposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 1985, pp. 372-382.\n[19] K.R. Iverson, \"A cryptographic schema for computerized general\nelections,\" Proceeding of Advances in Cryptology\u00d4\u00c7\u00f6 CRYPTO '91,\nSanta Barbara, USA, 1991, pp. 405-119.\n[20] H. Nurmi, A. Salomaa, L. Santean, \"Secret ballot elections in\ncomputer networks,\" Computer Security, vol. 10, no.6, 1991, pp. 553-\n560.\n[21] R.S.-N.A. Baraani-Dastjerdi, J. Pieprzyk, \"Secure voting protocol\nusing threshold schemas,\" Proceedings of the 11th IEEE Annual\nComputer Security Applications Conference, New Orleans, USA,\n1995, pp. 143-148.\n[22] C. Boyd, \"A new multiple keys cipher and an improved voting\nschema,\" Proceedings of Advances in Cryptology\u00d4\u00c7\u00f6\nEUROCRYPT'89, Hounthalen, Belgium, 1989, pp. 617-625.\n[23] F. Hohl, \"Time Limited Blackbox Security: Protecting Mobile Agents\nFrom Malicious Hosts,\" Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.\n1419, 1998, pp. 92-113.\n[24] A. Wagner, \"Implementing Mobile Agent Security In An Untrusted\nComputing Environment,\" Proceedings of the 8th International\nConference on Telecommunications, Zagreb, 2005, pp. 591-594."]}
Many electronic voting systems, classified mainly as homomorphic cryptography based, mix-net based and blind signature based, appear after the eighties when zero knowledge proofs were introduced. The common ground for all these three systems is that none of them works without real time cryptologic calculations that should be held on a server. As far as known, the agent-based approach has not been used in a secure electronic voting system. In this study, an agent-based electronic voting schema, which does not contain real time calculations on the server side, is proposed. Conventional cryptologic methods are used in the proposed schema and some of the requirements of an electronic voting system are constructed within the schema. The schema seems quite secure if the used cryptologic methods and agents are secure. In this paper, proposed schema will be explained and compared with already known electronic voting systems.
E-voting, Electronic voting, Mobile softwareagents, Offline electronic voting.
E-voting, Electronic voting, Mobile softwareagents, Offline electronic voting.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 146 | |
| downloads | 34 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts