{"references": ["E. Greengrass, \"Information Retrieval: A survey\". DOD Technical\nReport TR-R52-008-001, November 2000.", "G. Salton, E. A.Fox, H. Wu, \"Extended boolean information retrieval\",\nCommunications of the ACM, Volume 26, No. 11, 1983, Pages: 1022 -\n1036.", "J.H. Lee, \"Properties of extended boolean models in information\nretrieval\". Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM SIGIR\nConference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval,\n1994, Pages: 182 - 190.", "D. L. Lee, H. Chuang, K. Seamons, \"Document ranking and the Vector-\nSpace model\". IEEE Software, Volume 14, Issue 2, March 1997, Pages:\n67 - 75.", "S. Deerwester, S. Dumais, G. Furnas, T. Landauer, R. Harshman,\n\"Indexing by latent semantic analysis\", Journal of the American Society\nfor Information Science, Volume 41, Issue 6, 1990, Pages: 391- 407.", "M. E. Maron, J. L. Kuhns, \"On relevance, probabilistic indexing and\nretrieval\".Journal of the ACM, Volume 7, 1960, Pages: 216 - 244.", "F. Crestani, M. Lalmas, J. van Rijsbergen, L. Campbell, \"Is this\ndocument relevant? ...probably. A survey of probabilistic models in\ninformation retrieval\". ACM Computing Surveys, Volume 30, Issue 4,\nDecember 1998, Pages: 528 - 552.", "W.M Shaw, \"Term-Relevance computations and perfect retrieval\nperformance\". Information Processing& Management, Volume 31, No.\n4, 1995, Pages: 491 - 498.", "G. Amati, S. Kerpedjiev, \"An information retrieval logical model:\nimplementation and experiments\". Technical Report Rel 5B04892,\nFondazione Ugo Bordoni, Roma, Italy, March 1992.\n[10] H. Turtle, W.B. Croft, \"Evaluation of an inference network-based\nretrieval model\". ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Volume\n9, No. 3, 1991.\n[11] M. R. Henzinger, \"Hyperlink analysis for the web\". IEEE Internet\nComputing, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2001, Pages: 45 - 50.\n[12] S. Brin, L. Page, \"The anatomy of a Large-Scale Hyper-textual web\nsearch engine\". Proceedings of the Seventh International World Wide\nWeb Conference, Elsevier Science, New York, 1998, Pages: 107 - 117.\n[13] R. Baeza-Yates, E. Davis, \"Web page ranking using link attributes\".\nInternational World Wide Web Conference, Proceedings of the 13th\nInternational World Wide Web Conference on Alternate Track Papers &\nPosters, New York, NY, USA, 2004, Pages: 328 - 329.\n[14] R. Lempel, S. Moran. \"The stochastic approach for link-structure\nanalysis (SALSA) and the TKC e\u00aeect\". In The Ninth International\nWWW Conference, May 2000.\n[15] H. Zhuge, L. Zheng, \"Ranking Semantic-Linked network\". WWW\n(Posters), 2003.\n[16] D. Vallet, M. Fern\u251c\u00edndez, P. Castells, \"An Ontology-Based information\nretrieval model\". 2nd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC\n2005). Heraklion, Greece, May 2005. Springer Verlag Lecture Notes in\nComputer Science, Volume 3532. G\u251c\u2502mez-\nP\u00e9rez,A.;Euzenat,J.(Eds.),2005, Pages:455-470.\n[17] C. Rocha, D. Schwabe, M. Poggi de Arag\u251c\u00fao, \"A hybrid approach for\nsearching in the semantic web\". International World Wide Web\nConference, Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World\nWide Web, 2004, Pages: 374 - 383.\n[18] D.A. Grossman, O. Frieder. \"Information retrieval algorithms and\nheuristics\". Second ed. . Springer. 2004.\n[19] R. Rada, H. Mili, E. Bicknell, M Blettner, \"Development and application\nof a metric on semantic nets\". IEEE Transactions on System, man, and\nCybernetics, Volume 19, No. 1, Pages: 17 - 30.\n[20] Y.W. Kim, J.H. Kim, \"A model of knowledge based information\nretrieval with hierarchical concept graph\". Journal of Documentation,\nVolume 46, No. 2, 1998, Pages: 113 - 136.\n[21] M. Nakashima,Y. Kaneko, T. Ito, \"Ranking of documents by measures\nconsidering conceptual dependence between terms\". Systems and\nComputers in Japan, Volume 34, Issue 5, 2003, Pages: 81 - 91.\n[22] J.M. Ponte, W.B. Croft, \"A language modeling approach to information\nretrieval\". In Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research\nand Development in Information Retrieval, Pages: 275 - 281.\n[23] W. A. Woods, L. A. Bookman, A. Houston, R. J. Kuhns, P. Martin, S.\nGreen, \"Linguistic knowledge can improve information retrieval\".\nApplied Natural Language Conferences, Proceedings of the Sixth\nConference on Applied Natural Language Processing, 2000, Pages: 262\n- 267.\n[24] H. Rode, D. Hiemstra, \"Conceptual language models for Context-Aware\ntext retrieval\". Proceedings of the 13th Text Retrieval Conference\n(TREC), NIST Special Publications, 2005.\n[25] R. Belew, \"Adaptive information retrieval\". In Proceeding of the\nTwelfth Annual International ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and\nDevelopment in Information Retrieval, 1989, Pages: 11 - 20.\n[26] H.Chen, \"Machine learning for IR: Neural networks, symbolic learning,\nand genetic algorithims\". Journal of the American Society for\nInformation Science, Volume 46, No. 3, Pages: 194 - 216.\n[27] Rocchio, \"The SMART retrieval system experiments in automatic\ndocument processing\". Relevance Feedback in Information Retrieval,\nPrentice Hall, 1971, Pages: 313 - 323.\n[28] Aeroswarm,http://ubot.lockheedmartin.com/ubot/hotdaml/aeroswarm.ht\nml\n[29] LCNetTools,http://itlang/vb.net/archivio.asp?subMenu=Tutte&FullText\non&TypeRi=AND&keyword=LCNettools"]}

Increasing growth of information volume in the internet causes an increasing need to develop new (semi)automatic methods for retrieval of documents and ranking them according to their relevance to the user query. In this paper, after a brief review on ranking models, a new ontology based approach for ranking HTML documents is proposed and evaluated in various circumstances. Our approach is a combination of conceptual, statistical and linguistic methods. This combination reserves the precision of ranking without loosing the speed. Our approach exploits natural language processing techniques for extracting phrases and stemming words. Then an ontology based conceptual method will be used to annotate documents and expand the query. To expand a query the spread activation algorithm is improved so that the expansion can be done in various aspects. The annotated documents and the expanded query will be processed to compute the relevance degree exploiting statistical methods. The outstanding features of our approach are (1) combining conceptual, statistical and linguistic features of documents, (2) expanding the query with its related concepts before comparing to documents, (3) extracting and using both words and phrases to compute relevance degree, (4) improving the spread activation algorithm to do the expansion based on weighted combination of different conceptual relationships and (5) allowing variable document vector dimensions. A ranking system called ORank is developed to implement and test the proposed model. The test results will be included at the end of the paper.