Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Evolutionarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Evolution
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ZENODO
Article . 2001
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Evolution
Article . 2001 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley TDM
Data sources: Crossref
Evolution
Article . 2001 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Evolution
Article . 2002
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

OVIPOSITION ACCEPTANCE AND FECUNDITY SCHEDULE IN THE CACTOPHILIC SIBLING SPECIES DROSOPHILA BUZZATII AND D. KOEPFERAE ON THEIR NATURAL HOSTS

Authors: Fanara, J.J.; Hasson, E.;

OVIPOSITION ACCEPTANCE AND FECUNDITY SCHEDULE IN THE CACTOPHILIC SIBLING SPECIES DROSOPHILA BUZZATII AND D. KOEPFERAE ON THEIR NATURAL HOSTS

Abstract

We tested for the occurrence of oviposition acceptance for different media prepared with cactus tissues of three alternative cactus hosts: Opuntia sulphurea, O. quimilo and Trichocereus terschekii for 4 consecutive days in lines of two Drosophila buzzatii populations and one population of D. koepferae. Our results showed that the former laid significantly more eggs on both Opuntia cacti than on T. terschekii, whereas D. koepferae preferred T. terschekii. In addition, fecundity schedules differed between species: D. buzzatii laid similar numbers of eggs along the four-day sampling period, whereas D. koepferae showed an oviposition peak on the second day of egg collection on T. terschekii. We suggest that the between-species disparities observed in oviposition acceptance and fecundity schedule may be related to the temporal and spatial predictability of Opuntia versus T. terschekii (cardón) as part of the different adaptive strategies that have evolved after the split of D. koepferae and D. buzzatii from their recent common ancestor. Therefore, the willingness to accept hosts would be an important factor in the habitat selection and in the maintenance of species diversity.

Keywords

Insecta, Arthropoda, Diptera, Oviposition, Genetic Variation, Biodiversity, Biological Evolution, Host-Parasite Interactions, Magnoliopsida, Fertility, Species Specificity, fruit flies, flies, Animalia, Animals, Drosophila, Female, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    41
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
41
Average
Top 10%
Average
bronze