
Although there is no evidence of hybridization in nature, interspecific crosses in all six possible pairwise combinations may be effected in the laboratory amongst the four species of the Drosophila bipectinata complex (D. bipectinata, D. parabipectinata, D. malerkotliana and D. pseudoananassae) of the Oriental-Australian biogeographic zones. Results range from a high degree of crossability in one direction with production of large numbers of sterile male and fertile female offspring in a 1 : 1 ratio (bipectinata x parabipectinata) to almost complete isolation in both directions; in the latter case (malerkotlianaxpseudoananassae) the very small proportion of successful crosses yielded only a few females oflow viability. These results combined with those previously obtained in polytene chromosomal and electrophoretic investigations suggest very close phylogenetic relationships among bipectinata, parabipectinata and malerkotliana, with a greater degree of divergence between these species and pseudoananassae.
Insecta, Arthropoda, fruit flies, Diptera, flies, Animalia, Biodiversity, Taxonomy
Insecta, Arthropoda, fruit flies, Diptera, flies, Animalia, Biodiversity, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 35 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
