Downloads provided by UsageCounts
{"references": ["J. Holland, Adaptation in Neural and Artificial Systems. Ann. Arbor, MI:\nUniversity of Michigan, 1975.", "D. E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine\nLearning. New York: Addison-Wesley, 1989.", "Z. Michalewicz, Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution\nPrograms. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1992.", "T. Bach, F. Hoffmeister, and H. P. Schwefel, \"A survey of evolution strategies,\"\nin Proc of Fourth international conference on genetic algorithms,\npp. 2-9, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1991.", "J. J. Grefenstette, \"Optimization of control parameters for genetic algorithms,\"\nIEEE Trans. on Syst., Man and Cybern., vol. 16, pp. 122-128,\n1986.", "H. M\u252c\u00bfuhlenbein, M. Scomisch, and J. Born, \"The parallel genetic algorithm\nas function optimizer,\" in Proc. of Fourth Intl. Conf. on Genetic\nAlgorithms, pp. 271-278, San Mateo, Calif: Morgan Kaufmann, 1991.", "V. S. Gordon and D. Whitley, \"Serial and parallel genetic algorithms as\nfunction optimizers,\" in Proc. of the Fifth International Conference on\nGenetic Algorithms, (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA), pp. 177-183,\n1993.", "S. Baluja, \"Structure and performance of fi ne-grain parallelism in genetic\nsearch,\" in Proc. of the Fifth International Conference on Genetic\nAlgorithms, (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA), pp. 155-162, 1993.", "R. Shonkwiler, \"Parallel genetic algorithms,\" in Proc. of 5th Intl. Conf. on\nGenetic Algorithms, pp. 199-205, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann,\n1993.\n[10] E. Cant'u-Paz, \"A survey of parallel genetic algorithms,\" tech. rep., University\nof Illinois, Illinois GA Laboratory, Urbana Champaign, Urbana,\nIL, 1997.\n[11] E. Cant'u-Paz, \"On scalability of parallel genetic algorithms,\" Evolutionary\nComputation, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 429-449, 1999.\n[12] E. Cant'u-Paz, Effective and Accurate Parallel Genetic Algorithms.\nKluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.\n[13] S. Kirkpatrik, C. Gellat, and M.P.Vecchi, \"Optimization by simulated\nannealing,\" Science, vol. 220, pp. 671-680, 1983.\nUpper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR, 1999.\n[14] L. Yong, K. Lishan, and D. J. Evans, \"The annealing evolution algorithm\nas function optimizer,\" Parallel Computing, vol. 21, pp. 389-400, 1995.\n[15] A. Pr\u252c\u00bfugel-Bennett and J. L. Shapiro, \"Analysis of genetic algorithms\nusing statistical mechanics,\" Physical Review Letters, vol. 72, no. 9,\npp. 1305-1309, 1994.\n[16] D. E. Goldberg, \"A note on boltzmann tournament selection for genetic\nalgorithms and population-oriented simulated annealing,\" Complex\nSystems, vol. 4, pp. 445-460, 1990.\n[17] B. T. Zhang and J. J. Kim, \"Comparison of selection methods for\nevolutionary optimization,\" Evolutionary Optimization, vol. 2, no. 1,\npp. 55-70, 2000.\n[18] P. Martin, \"A pipelined hardware implementation of Genetic Programming\nusing FPGAs and Handle-C,\" tech. rep., University of Essex,\nDepartment of Computer Science, Colchester, UK, 2002.\n[19] M. Tommiska and J. Vuori, \"Implementation of genetic algorithms with\nprogrammable logic devices,\" in Proc. of the 2NWGA, pp. 71-78, 1996.\n[20] S. D. Scott, A. Samal and S. Seth, \"HGA: A Hardware-Based Genetic\nAlgorithm\", in Intl. Symposium on Field-Programmable Gate Array,\npp. 53-59, 1995.\n[21] I. M. Bland and G. M. Megson, \"Effi cient operator pipelining in a bit\nserial genetic algorithm engine,\" Electronic Letters, vol. 33, pp. 1026-\n1028, 1997.\n[22] M. K. Pakhira and R. K. De, \"A hardware pipeline for function\noptimization using genetic algorithms,\" in Proc. of Genetic and Evolutionary\nComputation Conference (GECCO - 05), (Washington DC, USA),\npp. 949-956, 2005.\n[23] M. K. Pakhira, \"Postfi x hardware evaluation unit for genetic algorithms:\nApplication in fuzzy clustering,\" in Proc. of Intl.conf. on Advanced\nComputing and Communications (ADCOM - 06), (Mangalore, INDIA),\npp. 357-360, 2006.\n[24] M. K. Pakhira, \"Genetic evaluation in hardware: Application in fuzzy\nclustering,\" accepted in Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences,\n2007 (to appear).\n[25] J. L. R. Filho, P. C. Treleaven, and C. Alippi, \"Genetic algorithm\nprogramming environments,\" IEEE Computer, pp. 28-43, June, 1994.\n[26] M. D. Vose, The simple Genetic Algorithms: Foundations and Theory\n(Complex Adaptive Systems). New York: The MIT Press, 1999.\n[27] D. D. Cox and S. John, \"SDO: A statistical method for global optimization,\"\nin Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (Hampton, VA), 1995,\npp. 315-329, Philadelphia, PA: SIMA, 1997."]}
In this paper, a pipelined version of genetic algorithm, called PLGA, and a corresponding hardware platform are described. The basic operations of conventional GA (CGA) are made pipelined using an appropriate selection scheme. The selection operator, used here, is stochastic in nature and is called SA-selection. This helps maintaining the basic generational nature of the proposed pipelined GA (PLGA). A number of benchmark problems are used to compare the performances of conventional roulette-wheel selection and the SA-selection. These include unimodal and multimodal functions with dimensionality varying from very small to very large. It is seen that the SA-selection scheme is giving comparable performances with respect to the classical roulette-wheel selection scheme, for all the instances, when quality of solutions and rate of convergence are considered. The speedups obtained by PLGA for different benchmarks are found to be significant. It is shown that a complete hardware pipeline can be developed using the proposed scheme, if parallel evaluation of the fitness expression is possible. In this connection a low-cost but very fast hardware evaluation unit is described. Results of simulation experiments show that in a pipelined hardware environment, PLGA will be much faster than CGA. In terms of efficiency, PLGA is found to outperform parallel GA (PGA) also.
Optimization, Hardware evaluation, Pipelined genetic algorithm, SA-selection., Hardware pipeline
Optimization, Hardware evaluation, Pipelined genetic algorithm, SA-selection., Hardware pipeline
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 4 | |
| downloads | 7 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts