Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

PRO-Ethics D2.4 Reports on Pilot II Results

Authors: Schuerz, Stefanie; Fetting, Constanze; Shiroka, Stela;

PRO-Ethics D2.4 Reports on Pilot II Results

Abstract

The PRO-Ethics project is geared towards the development of an Ethics Framework and Guidelines supporting the ethical implementation of participatory processes in the activities of research funding organizations (RFOs). This core output is developed in an iterative process and tested in the context of 10 participatory pilots, which also served to identify best practices, and find levers to adapt institutional processes and embed the learnings of the project in regional and national R&I ecosystems across Europe. These pilots have been implemented in two phases. The present deliverable gives insight into the processes of pilot phase II, as well as the concrete lessons that could be extracted from them. Pilot data has been collected through various instruments, including structured activity reports, reflection and evaluation workshops, pilot stories, and narrations provided in the context of regular consortium calls, collected in the form of minutes and transcripts. In addition, two workshops with external stakeholders were held and their insights documented in the present deliverable. These data indicate various tensions and points of friction, as well as possible solutions and recommendations related to the implementation of participatory activities. Broadly speaking, these pertain e.g. to structural barriers, limited resources, time constraints, limited expertise, and processual uncertainties on the side of the implementing organizations. Regarding participants, access to the field, understanding and addressing stakeholders’ needs and expectations, emergent role conflicts and appropriate engagement formats came up as examples of relevant issues impacting the success of a pilot.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green