OPUS Deliverable 5.1: Initial Policy Brief

Reviewing the Landscape on Research Assessment and Open Science and Developing a Framework for Researcher Assessment that Incentivises and Rewards Open Science

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Project deliverable , Other literature type 15 Feb 2024Publisher:ZenodoFunded by:UKRI | OPUS - Open Universal Sci..., EC | OPUS

Authors: O'Neill, Gareth; Chaves-Chaparro, Juliana;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10664124 , 10.5281/zenodo.10664123

OPUS Deliverable 5.1: Initial Policy Brief

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

This initial policy brief presents the preliminary results of the OPUS project, coming from two states-of-the-art. The first covered existing academic and policy literature related to researcher assessment and Open Science. The second looked at current initiatives to improve researcher assessment and support Open Science. These results are presented below and feed into policy recommendations on researcher assessment and Open Science.

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

Found an issue? Give us feedback

0

Average

Green

Fields of Science

social sciences

other social sciences

Fields of Science

social sciences

other social sciences

Funded by

UKRI| OPUS - Open Universal Science, EC| OPUS