
We herewith initiate a crowd-sourced mapping of Peer Review resources for a global research community to be informed and continue to co-create what we see as useful best practices and community standards. Objective The primary aim of this proposal is to establish a comprehensive and efficient peer review system that filters through marketing noise, emphasizing the distillation of peer review best practices. By identifying and promoting resources that adhere to rigorous standards, we aim to contribute to a culture of accountability and reproducibility, aligning with the principles that the Open Science (OS) community has brought to the forefront. Contributions Conceptualization and Writing: MJM, GD, JH (per CRediT taxonomy) Project description: 10.21428/51e64700.fcd86e15 Contact MJM: stories4sci@gmail.comJH: info@access2perspectives.org
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
