{"references": ["T. C. Devezas, H. A. Linstone and J.S. Santos Humberto, \"The Growth\nDynamics of The Internet and The Long Wave Theory\". Technological\nForecasting & Social Change, vol. 72, 2005, pp. 913-935.", "S. Arnaldi, \"Converging Technologies in The Italian Daily Press 2002-\n2006: Preliminary Results of An Ongoing Research Project\".\nInnovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, Vol.21/1,\n2008, pp. 87-94.", "J. Canton, \"The Impact of Convergent Technologies and the Future of\nBusiness and The Economy\". in Converging Technologies For\nImproving Human Performance - Nanotechnology, Biotechnology,\nInformation Technology and Cognitive Science. M Roco & W.S.\nBainbridge, Eds. National Science Foundation Report. USA: World\nTechnology Evaluation Center (WTEC) Inc., 2002, pp. 61-68.", "G. Gaskell, T.T. Eyck, J. Jackson, and G. Veltri, \"Imagining\nnanotechnology: Cultural support for technological innovation in Europe\nand the United States\". Public Understanding Science. Vol.14, 2005, pp.\n81-90.", "L. F. Stephens, \"News Narratives about Nano S&T in Major U.S. and\nNon-U.S. Newspapers\", Science Communication, vol. 27, 2005, pp.\n175-199.", "\"Venture Capital Funding of Nanotechnology\", ObservatoryNano\nReport, 2009, pp. 1-14. http://www.observatorynano.eu/project/file\nsystem/files/Economics_VentureCapital_fullversion.pdf.", "RNCOS Nanotechnology Market Forecast Report 2013, March 2010.\nhttp://www.rncos.com/Report/IM185.htm.", "A. Laing, \"A report on Canadian and American news media coverage of\nnanotechnology issues\", pp. 88-98. www.nanotechproject.org/file_\ndownload/25.", "\"Preparing for our future: Developing a common strategy for key\nenabling technologies in the EU\", Commission of the European\nCommunities Report, 2009, http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/ict\n/files/communication_key_enabling_technologies_sec1257_en.pdf.\n[10] J. Macoubrie, \"Informed Public Perceptions of Nanotechnology and\nTrust in Government\", The Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, the\nWoodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 2005.\nhttp://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/Reports/Nan\notechnologies/Nanotech_0905.pdf.\n[11] \"EU-funded study: nanotechnology decision-making needs greater\npublic involvement\", 2009, http://cordis.europa.eu/fetch?CALLER\n=EN_NEWS&ACTION=D&DOC=31&CAT=NEWS&QUERY=0127b\nb81d1ba:e4b2:7cbdeb35&RCN=31300.\n[12] T. Listerman, \"Framing of science issues in opinion-leading news:\ninternational comparison of biotechnology issue coverage\", Public\nUnderstanding of Science, vol.19, 2010, pp. 5-15.\n[13] A. Petersen, A. Anderson, S. Allan and C. Wilkinson, \"Opening the\nblack box: scientists- views on the role of the news media in the\nnanotechnology debate\", Public Understanding of Science, 2009, vol.18,\npp. 512-530.\n[14] B. Faber, \"Popularizing Nanoscience: The Public Rhetoric of\nNanotechnology, 1986-1999\", Technical Communication Quarterly,\n2009, vol. 15, no.2, pp.141-169.\n[15] T. Sheetz, J. Vidal, T. D. Pearson, K. Lozano, \"Nanotechnology:\nAwareness and societal concerns\", Technology in Society, 2005, vol. 27,\npp. 329-345.\n[16] L. F. Stephens, \"News Narratives about Nano S&T in Major U.S. and\nNon-U.S. Newspapers\", Science Communication, vol. 27, 2005, pp.\n175-199.\n[17] Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) Report, \"Positive image of\nnanotechnology in the media\", 2008, http://www.bfr.bund.de/cd/26907.\n[18] M. C. Nisbet and C. Money, \"Science and Society: Framing Science\",\nScience, vol. 316, 2007, pp. 56.\n[19] M. C. Nisbet, D. Brossard and A. Kroepsch, \"Framing Science: The\nStem Cell Controversy in an Age of Press/Politics\", The Harvard\nInternational Journal of Press/Politics, 2003, vol.8, pp. 36-70.\n[20] \"Q&A: Professor provides analysis of work on nanotechnology\nresearch\", 2008, http://www.news.wisc.edu/16060.\n[21] M. D. Cobb and J. Macoubrie, \"Public perceptions about\nnanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust\", Journal of Nanoparticle\nResearch, 2004, vol. 6, pp. 395-405.\n[22] D. A. Scheufele and B. V. Lewenstein, \"The public and nanotechnology:\nHow citizens make sense of emerging Technologies\", Journal of\nNanoparticle Research, 2005, vol.7, pp. 659-667.\n[23] \"Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties\",\nThe Royal Society & The Royal Academy of Engineering Report, 2004,\nhttp://www.cst.gov.uk/business/files/nano-report-2004-fin.pdf, p. xi.\n[24] Y. Fujita, \"Perception of nanotechnology among general public in\nJapan\", NRI Nanotechnology and Public Survey Project, Asia Pacific\nNanotech Weekly, 2006, no.4, http://www.nanoworld.jp/apnw/\narticles/library4/pdf/4-6.pdf.\n[25] \"Awareness of and Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology and Synthetic\nBiology\", Project On Emerging Nanotechnologies, The Woodrow\nWilson International Center For Scholars, 2008,\nwww.nanotechproject.org/process/assets/files/7040/finalsynbioreport.\npdf.\n[26] R. Entman, \"Framing: Toward Clarification of A Fractured Paradigm\"\nJournal of Communication, 1993, vol:43, no:4, pp. 51-58.\n[27] M. McCombs, \"A Look at Agenda-Setting Theory: Past, Present and\nFuture\", Journalism Studies, 2005, vol:6, no:4, pp. 543-557.\n[28] J. N. Bostick, \"Second-Level Agenda-Setting and Political Advertising:\nA Content Analysis of the Framing Dimensions by The 2004\nPresidential Candidates\", A Thesis in Mass Communications, The\nGraduate Faculty of Texas Tech University, May 2005,\nhttp://etd.lib.ttu.edu/theses/available/etd-05052005-202937/unrestricted/\nthesis_merged.pdf, p. 15.\n[29] K. Hallahan, \"Seven Models of Framing: Implications for Public\nRelations\", Journal of Public Relations Research, 1999, vol:11, no:3, pp.\n205-242.\n[30] A. Yagade and D. M. Dozier, \"The Media Agenda Setting Effects of\nConcrete Versus Abstract Issues\", Journalism Quarterly, 1990, vol:67,\npp. 3-10.\n[31] S. Ghanem, \"Filling In The Tapestry: The Second Level Of Agenda\nSetting\", in Communication And Democracy: Exploring The Intellectual\nFrontiers in Agenda-Setting Theory, M. McCombs, D. Shaw, D.\nWeaver, Eds. Mahwah, NewJersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,\n1997, pp. 3-14.\n[32] C. Lee And D. A. Scheufele, \"The Influence of Knowledge And\nDeference Toward Scientific Authority: A Media Effects Model For\nPublic Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology\", ]&MC Quarterly, vol. 83,\nno. 4, 2006, pp. 819-834.\n[33] A. I. Arias, \"The Media Coverage of Nanotechnology\", NNIN REU\nResearch Accomplishments, 2004, pp. 18-19.\n[34] Z. Pan and G. M. Kosicki, \"Framing analysis: An approach to news\ndiscourse\", Political Communication, vol.10, 1993, pp. 55-75.\n[35] D. A. Weaver, E. Lively and B. Bimber, \"Searching for a Frame: News\nMedia Tell the Story of Technological Progress, Risk, and Regulation\",\nScience Communication, vol.31, 2009, pp: 139-166.\n[36] R. S. Kj\u251c\u00aargaard, \"Making a small country count: nanotechnology in\nDanish newspapers from 1996 to 2006\", Public Understanding of\nScience, vol.19, no.1, 2010, pp. 80-97.\n[37] S.M. Friedman and B.P. Egolf, \"Nanotechnology: Risk and the Media\",\nIEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 2005, pp. 5-11.\n[38] J. Simons, R. Zimmer, C. Vierboom, I. Ha\u252c\u00bfrlen, R. Hertel and G. F. B\u00f6l,\n\"The slings and arrows of communication on nanotechnology\", Journal\nof Nanopart Res,, 2009, vol. 11, pp. 1555-1571."]}

As the new industrial revolution advances in the nanotechnology have been followed with interest throughout the world and also in Turkey. Media has an important role in conveying these advances to public, rising public awareness and creating attitudes related to nanotechnology. As well as representing how a subject is treated, media frames determine how public think about this subject. In literature definite frames related to nanoscience and nanotechnology such as process, regulation, conflict and risks were mentioned in studies focusing different countries. So how nanotechnology news is treated by which frames and in which news categories in Turkey as a one of developing countries? In this study examining different variables about nanotechnology that affect public attitudes such as category, frame, story tone, source in Turkish media via framing analysis developed in agenda setting studies was aimed. In the analysis data between 2005 and 2009 obtained from the first five national newspapers with wide circulation in Turkey will be used. In this study the direction of the media about nanotechnology, in which frames nanotechnologic advances brought to agenda were reported as news, and sectoral, legal, economic and social scenes reflected by these frames to public related to nanotechnology in Turkey were planned.