Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

D6.4 – Gendering Scientific Publications Guidelines

Authors: Santinhos, Miguel; Colaiacomo, Claudio; Rosetta, Federica; Żadkowska, Magdalena; Kosakowska-Berezecka, Natasza; BALZANO, ANGELA; SOLERA, Cristina;

D6.4 – Gendering Scientific Publications Guidelines

Abstract

This deliverable presents a set of recommended guidelines for promoting gender sensitivity in scientific publications. The objective is to provide clear and shareable instructions on conducting gender-sensitive reviews and promoting gender-aware publications. The guidelines aim to foster a more equitable and diverse scientific community by helping to mitigate biases, drive innovation, and address societal challenges by promoting gender equity in research outputs. The deliverable outlines and discusses the conduction of a workshop on gendering scientific publications guidelines, which brought together stakeholders and resulted in recommendations for enhancing the guidelines' effectiveness and impact. The recommendations emphasise cross-functional collaboration, education and training, role models and keynote speakers, accessible communication, and inclusivity in the review process. The report concludes with the next steps, including stakeholder engagement, resource development, implementation strategies, monitoring and evaluation, and dissemination of knowledge. By prioritising these steps, the scientific community can work towards a future of equitable and inclusive scientific publishing that reflects diverse perspectives and experiences.

Keywords

Gender equality, Gender Equity, MINDtheGEPs, Gender inequality, Gender mainstreaming, Gender issue, Scientific publication, Gender equality plans, GEPs, Gender studies, Women's studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average