
HPLC has become the workhorse of analytical separations due to its versatility, sensitivity, and precision. However, optimizing and validating an HPLC method for specific analytes requires an intricate adjustment of parameters. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the key steps involved in developing and validating a robust HPLC method. Initially, we delve into the critical factors influencing method development, including analyte properties, sample preparation strategies, column selection, mobile phase optimization, and detector choice. We detail the importance of resolution, peak shape, and retention time control in achieving optimal separation. Next, we dissect the validation process, highlighting essential parameters like linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), accuracy, precision, specificity, robustness, and system suitability. We discuss established protocols and regulatory guidelines for each parameter, emphasizing the principles behind their evaluation. Furthermore, we explore advanced method development approaches, such as hyphenation with mass spectrometry (MS) for enhanced analyte identification and quantitative analysis. We also briefly touch upon emerging trends in HPLC, including microfluidic chips and green chromatography practices. This review serves as a valuable resource for both novice and experienced analysts, offering a roadmap for navigating the intricacies of HPLC method development and validation, ultimately paving the way for reliable and reproducible analytical results.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
