Downloads provided by UsageCounts
{"references": ["I. Sommerville, Software Engineering (8th Edition). Addison Wesley,\npp. 20-42, 2007.", "E. A. Hartmann and A. Westerwick, \"Shopfloor Systems Based on\nHuman Skill and Experience,\" in Proc. 7th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA\nSymposium on Analysis; Design and Evaluation of Man-Machine\nSystems, Kyoto, Japan, Sept. 16-18, 1998.", "A. Dix, J. Finlay, G. Abowd, R. Beale, Human Computer Interaction,\n2nd Edition.Prentice Hall - Europe, 1998.", "H. Yajima, Y. Yoshikawa, M. Tamano, R. Itsuki and T. Hirose,\n\"Information Integration of Heterogeneous Multimedia Information for\nStrategic Planning System,\" in Proc. of the 7th International Federation\nof Automatic Control - Man Machine Systems (IFAC-MMS). KYOTO,\nJAPAN, September, 16-18, 1998.", "R. G. Bias and D. J. Mayhew, Cost-Justifying Usability: An Update for\nthe Internet Age. Morgan Kaufmann, Elsevier, pp. 19, 2005.", "S. Lauesen, User Interface Design: A software Engineering Perspective.\nHarlow: England: Pearson-Addison-Wesley, 2005, pp. 41-66.", "ISO 13407: Human-centered design processes for interactive systems\n(Online). Available: http://www.usabilitynet.org/tools/13407stds", "Y. Dodge, The Concise Encyclopedia of Statistics. Springer, 2008.", "P. L. Gardner, \"Discusses assumptions of the t-test,\" Scales and\nStatistics: Review of Educational Research, vol. 45, pp. 43-57, 1975.\n[10] R. Johanson and G. Bhattacharyhya, Statistics Principles and Methods.\n3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1996.\n[11] J. P. Chin, V. A. Diehl and K. L. Norman, K. L. \u00d4\u00c7\u00d7Development of an\ninstrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer\ninterface,\" in proc. of CHI -88 human factors in computing systems, pp.\n213-218, New York: ACM Press, 1988.\n[12] SUMI: Software Usability Measurement Inventory (Online). Available:\nhttp://sumi.ucc.ie/whatis.html\n[13] MUMMS: Measuring the Usability of Multi-Media Software (Online).\nAvailable: http://www.ucc.ie/hfrg/questionnaires/mumms/index.html\n[14] 12 J. R. Lewis, \"IBM Computer Usability Satisfaction Questionnaires:\nPsychometric Evaluation and Instructions for Use,\" International\nJournal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 57-78, 1995\n[15] A. A. Ozok, \"Survey design and implementation in HCI,\" in handbook\nThe Human-Computer Interaction Handbook Fundamentals, Evolving\nTechnologies, and Emerging Applications, 2nd ed., A. Sears and J.\nJacko, Ed. New Yoork: Taylor & Francis Group, 2008, pp. 1151-1169.\n[16] N. A. Streitz, \"Cognitive compatibility as a central issue in humancomputer\ninteraction: Theoretical framework and empirical findings\", in\nG. Salvendy (Ed.), Cognitive engineering in the design of humancomputer\ninteraction and expert systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1987,\npp. 75-82.\n[17] M. B. Rosson, S. Maass, W. A. Kellog, \"The designer as user: Building\nrequirements for design tools from design practice,\" Communications of\nthe ACM, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1288-97, 1989.\n[18] K. Weidehhaupt, K. Pohl, M. Jarke and P. Haumer, \"Scenarios in system\ndevelopment,\" Current practice. IEEE Software, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 34-\n45, 1998.\n[19] I. Adwan, \"Applying and developing usability engineering for the\nadministration of Procurement and Warehousing Processes in\n\"UNRWA\" by Using the Software package - (Reality),\" MBA thesis,\nInstitute Business and Economic Studies, Al-Quds Univ., Abu Dies,\nJerusalem, 2006.\n[20] ISO 9241-11: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual\ndisplay terminals (VDTs) - Part 11: Guidance on usability, 1998.\n[21] B. Shneiderman, C. Plaisant, Designing the User Interface: Strategies\nfor Effective Human-Computer Interaction. 4th Edition, Addison Wesley\nLongman, 2004.\n[22] K. Bohmann. (2000, July 4). User Performance Metrics (Online).\nAvailable:\nhttp://www.bohmann.dk/articles/user_performance_metrics.html\n[23] J. Pallant, SPSS Survival Manual: A Step By Step Guide to Data\nAnalysis Using SPSS for Windows, Open University Press, 2007.\n[24] M. B. Rosson and J. M. Carroll, Usability Engineering: Scenario-Based\nDevelopment of Human-Computer Interaction, Morgan Kaufmann\nPublishers, 2002.\n[25] J. M. Caroll, Making Use: Scenario-Based Design of Human-Computer\nInteractions, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.\n[26] M. B. Rosson, S. Maass and W. A. Kellog, \"The designer as user:\nBuilding requirements for design tools from design practice,\"\nCommunications of the ACM, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1288-97, 1989."]}
This interdisciplinary study is an investigation to evaluate user-interfaces in business administration. The study is going to be implemented on two computerized business administration systems with two distinctive user-interfaces, so that differences between the two systems can be determined. Both systems, a commercial and a prototype developed for the purpose of this study, deal with ordering of supplies, tendering procedures, issuing purchase orders, controlling the movement of the stocks against their actual balances on the shelves and editing them on their tabulations. In the second suggested system, modern computer graphics and multimedia issues were taken into consideration to cover the drawbacks of the first system. To highlight differences between the two investigated systems regarding some chosen standard quality criteria, the study employs various statistical techniques and methods to evaluate the users- interaction with both systems. The study variables are divided into two divisions: independent representing the interfaces of the two systems, and dependent embracing efficiency, effectiveness, satisfaction, error rate etc.
software prototyping, user-interface design., Evaluation and usability testing, statistical methods
software prototyping, user-interface design., Evaluation and usability testing, statistical methods
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 7 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts