Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

CLINICAL AUDIT ON CROSS-DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION: EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMUNICATION AND COORDINATION BETWEEN DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS, SUCH AS RADIOLOGY, LABORATORY SERVICES, AND VARIOUS MEDICAL SPECIALTIES

Authors: Muhammad Shaahiq, Asad Ramzan, Nabeel Ramzan, Afrah Ramzan, Zahra Imran, Rafey Mehmood Malik, Muhammad Abbas;

CLINICAL AUDIT ON CROSS-DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION: EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMUNICATION AND COORDINATION BETWEEN DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS, SUCH AS RADIOLOGY, LABORATORY SERVICES, AND VARIOUS MEDICAL SPECIALTIES

Abstract

Background: Effective communication and collaboration between departments are crucial for optimal patient care. This clinical audit evaluated cross-departmental coordination in a healthcare institution, focusing on radiology, laboratory services, and medical specialties. Methods: The audit employed a mixed-methods approach, utilizing data collection through medical record review, semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals, and analysis of communication metrics and existing protocols. Results: The audit revealed strengths in the reliance on diverse communication channels but identified weaknesses in outdated software, lack of real-time notifications, and unclear escalation procedures. Information sharing was hindered by inconsistent access rights, report formatting, and missing data elements. Clinical protocols, while clear for routine cases, lacked guidance for unforeseen situations and standardized interdepartmental communication, leading to inconsistencies in adherence and potential errors. Conclusion: This audit highlights the need for modernization and streamlining of communication channels, standardization of information sharing, and development of robust clinical protocols with guidance for unforeseen events and interdepartmental communication pathways. Implementing these improvements can foster a more efficient, collaborative, and patient-centered care environment. Keywords: Cross-departmental coordination, communication, information sharing, clinical protocols, patient care

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green