
Information The dataset contains 300 decisions of the German Federal Constitutional Court for which the proportionality test was annotated at sentence level. Each decision was annotated by at least two people and, in case of disagreement, a gold standard was curated by experts. The dataset provides the individual annotations (folder anno_data/) and the gold standard as single documents (folder gold_data/). Furthermore, the data is also available as a merged dataset (at sentence level sent_data.csv and aggregated for the decision level dec_agg_data.csv). Further information is available in the documentation Lüders_vhmk-data-description.pdf. Contact kilian.lueders@hu-berlin.de Data Sources Wendel, Luisa, & Möllers, Christoph (2023). Korpus der Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts (2.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10369205 Wendel, Luisa (2023). Metadaten zu Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts (2.7.1) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10378324 Project Leibniz Linguistic Research into Constitutional Lawhttps://www.lehrstuhl-moellers.de/llcon Funding DFG Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz of Prof. Dr. Christoph Möllers, LLM.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
