Fig. 5 in Repellency of -pinene against the house fly, Musca domestica

Fig. 5. Electroantennogram response to (1S)-(–)-α-pinene 1 and (1R)-(+)-α-pinene 2 odorants. Values represent the mean response magnitudes of antennae from three female flies normalized to 95% ethanol control responses. Error bars indicate SEM. Inset shows representative EAG recordings for each enantiomer tested.

Published as part of Haselton, Aaron T., Acevedo, Angela, Kuruvilla, Jacob, Werner, Eric, Kiernan, Jaydon & Dhar, Preeti, 2015, Repellency of -pinene against the house fly, Musca domestica, pp. 469-475 in Phytochemistry 117 on page 473, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2015.07.004, http://zenodo.org/record/10486188

Related Organizations

State University of New York at New Paltz
United States

Keywords

Biodiversity, Taxonomy

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

Found an issue? Give us feedback

0

Average