Fig. 1. Responses of Green Treefrogs to presentation of conspecific calls (Con), heterospecific calls (Het), white noise (N) and silence (S). (a) The proportion of frogs that reached the arena wall was similar for the different treatment stimuli. (b) Orientation (angular deviation; least square means ± SE) was not directional towards the speaker presenting treatment stimuli; speaker position at 0 degree. (c) Approach latency was similar across treatments; (d) Polar diagrams showing the locations at which frogs touched the arena wall in relation to the position of the speaker (at 0 degree; top of diagram); each dot represents one frog.

Published as part of Grzelak, Katarzyna & Sørensen, Martin V., 2022, Echinoderes blazeji Grzelak & Sørensen 2022, sp. nov., pp. 1-8 in Zoological Studies 55 (17) on page 5, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7225400