
We present a benchmark study of surrogate models for impurities embedded into crystalline solids. Using the Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker Green Function method [1], we have built databases of several thousand calculations of single impurities (monomers) embedded into different elemental crystals, as well as of the topological insulator Bi2Te3, magnetically co-doped with transition metal impurities (dimers). We predict the converged monomer impurity electron potential and the isotropic exchange interaction of the impurity dimer in the classical Heisenberg model. From these surrogates, we intend to build transferable models for larger systems in the future, which will accelerate the convergence of our DFT codes. The study compares various recent E(3)-equivariant models such as ACE and NequIP [2] in terms of performance and reproducible end-to-end workflows.[1] P. Rüßmann et al., npj Comput Mater 7, 13 (2021)[2] I. Batatia et al., arXiv:2205.06643 (2022)
Psi-k 2022 Conference, psik2022, Lausanne, RWTH Aachen University, Switzerland, 22 Aug 2022 - 25 Aug 2022
property prediction, KKR method, magnetic interaction, quantum materials, AiiDA, materials database, scientific workflows, graph neural networks, JuDFT, JuKKR, Heisenberg model, AiiDA-KKR, material defects, database generation, topological insulators, machine learning, magnetism, active learning, impurity embedding, density functional theory, atomistic machine learning
property prediction, KKR method, magnetic interaction, quantum materials, AiiDA, materials database, scientific workflows, graph neural networks, JuDFT, JuKKR, Heisenberg model, AiiDA-KKR, material defects, database generation, topological insulators, machine learning, magnetism, active learning, impurity embedding, density functional theory, atomistic machine learning
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
