
FIGURE 16. Strict consensus of three cladograms obtained with setk.run and concavity 7.8125. All characters non-additive. Fit = 7.38251, length = 161.30. Absolute/relative Bremer support are in each node. The names of the genera and species in the cladogram are in accordance with the results obtained in the cladistic analysis carried out here, and do not consider the new genera and transfers proposed by Galleti-Lima et al. 2023.
Published as part of Bertani, Rogério, 2023, Taxonomic revision and cladistic analysis of Lasiodora C. L. Koch, 1850 (Araneae, Theraphosidae) with notes on related genera, pp. 1-116 in Zootaxa 5390 (1) on page 23, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5390.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/10434516
Theraphosidae, Arthropoda, Arachnida, Animalia, Araneae, Biodiversity, Lasiodora, Taxonomy
Theraphosidae, Arthropoda, Arachnida, Animalia, Araneae, Biodiversity, Lasiodora, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
