
pmid: 38170773
pmc: PMC10776005
Recent respiratory disease screening studies suggest promising performance of cough classifiers, but potential biases in model training and dataset quality preclude robust conclusions. To examine tuberculosis (TB) cough diagnostic features, we enrolled subjects with pulmonary TB (N= 149) and controls with other respiratory illnesses (N= 46) in Nairobi. We collected a dataset with 33,000 passive coughs and 1600 forced coughs in a controlled setting with similar demographics. We trained a ResNet18-based cough classifier using images of passive cough scalogram as input and obtained a fivefold cross-validation sensitivity of 0.70 (±0.11 SD). The smartphone-based model had better performance in subjects with higher bacterial load {receiver operating characteristic–area under the curve (ROC-AUC): 0.87 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87 to 0.88],P< 0.001} or lung cavities [ROC-AUC: 0.89 (95% CI: 0.88 to 0.89),P< 0.001]. Overall, our data suggest that passive cough features distinguish TB from non-TB subjects and are associated with bacterial burden and disease severity.
Cough, ROC Curve, Humans, Tuberculosis, Kenya, Tuberculosis, Pulmonary, Research Articles
Cough, ROC Curve, Humans, Tuberculosis, Kenya, Tuberculosis, Pulmonary, Research Articles
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
