
The growing competition to compress Development Time of an Electromechanical Product mainly in Automotive Industry has resulted into more focus on pre-validation of Product Design which is also called Design Verification. It involves mainly verifying the Product with end customer boundary conditions into Simulation Tool and predict the behaviour after application of defined load cases without building and testing on actual physical samples. Simply called Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) this not only gives confidence to the Product Designer but also saves lot of time and cost involved in the iterative physical testing. Now as this verification is crucial, so it is also important to understand if results are reliable enough to implement the findings into our Product Design. This paper focus mainly on quality of Simulation Results in CATIA V5 by characterization of Global Error Rate and it’s impact on different simulation set-up and parameters.
Electromechanical, Structural Stimulation, Catia, Quality
Electromechanical, Structural Stimulation, Catia, Quality
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
