Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2023
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Report . 2023
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2023
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Neon Accuracy Test Report

Authors: Baumann, Chris; Dierkes, Kai;

Neon Accuracy Test Report

Abstract

We present the results of a validation study, assessing the gaze-estimation accuracy of the Neon eye-tracking system by Pupil Labs. We provide results obtained from, 1) a screen-based experiment conducted in a controlled lab environment, and 2) from ‘in-the-wild’ scenarios. In particular, we show that - without a user-specific calibration - Neon achieves a per-subject median accuracy of 1.8° at 1.3m depth and across a 60° x 35° field of view. By applying a simple offset correction, median per-subject accuracy can be further improved to 1.3°. Furthermore, our results highlight that Neon operates robustly in lighting conditions ranging from total darkness to bright sunlight, for a representative spectrum of eye appearances, as well as for realistic variations in position on the wearer's head. For instance, we show that median accuracy stays within 0.2°-0.4° between indoor and outdoor settings.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Top 10%
Average
Average