Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

D1.2 Quality and Risk Management Plan_approved by the EC

Authors: Julian Anne-Gaëlle;

D1.2 Quality and Risk Management Plan_approved by the EC

Abstract

In the transition towards Open Access (OA), institutional publishing is challenged by fragmentation and varying service quality, visibility, and sustainability. To address this issue, DIAMAS gathers 23 organisations from 12 European countries, well-versed in OA academic publishing and scholarly communication. The project will: 1. Map the current landscape of Institutional Publishing Service Providers (IPSPs) in 25 countries of the ERA with special attention for IPSPs that do not charge fees for publishing or reading. This will yield a taxonomy of IPSPs and an IPSP landscape report, a basis for the rest of the project. 2. Coordinate and improve the efficiency and quality of IPSPs by developing a European Quality Standard for Institutional Publishing (EQSIP). This quality seal will professionalise, strengthen and reduce the fragmentation of institutional publishing in Europe. EQSIP will serve as a benchmark for a gap analysis of the data. The Quality and Risk Management Plan (QRMP) outlines the actions to be undertaken during the lifetime of the DIAMAS project to ensure quality of the deliverables (reviewing process) and manage the risks (mitigation measures). The objective of the Quality and Risk Management Plan is to define the processes that will apply throughout the DIAMAS project in order to monitor the activities, to identify and mitigate potential risks, and to ensure the successful execution of the project. In addition, deliverable review procedures and reporting timelines are defined to guarantee the quality of the work. The guidelines apply to all Work Packages (WPs). This document also serves as a core reference for the consortium organisation and delivery of the day-to-day work throughout the project and will be updated twice (M18 and M36). This plan will serve as a guide to both the project coordinator and participants, in order to guarantee that quality reviews will be carried out at appropriate points in the project, and as a reference guide to understanding participants' responsibilities concerning the project communication, deliverables, and outcomes. It applies to all project-related activities, and thus compliance with the QRMP is mandatory for all involved in the project. The QRMP includes descriptions of already identified critical risks for implementation, and the description of the organisational measures implemented to ensure the quality management and monitoring.

Deliverable approved by the European Commission

Related Organizations
Keywords

scholarly communication, Open Access publishing, quality assurance, risk mitigation, institutional publishing

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average