Fig. 9 in Cryptic species complex or an incomplete speciation? Phylogeographic analysis reveals an intricate Pleistocene history of Priapulus caudatus Lamarck, 1816
Fig. 9 in Cryptic species complex or an incomplete speciation? Phylogeographic analysis reveals an intricate Pleistocene history of Priapulus caudatus Lamarck, 1816
Published as part of Kolbasova, Glafira, Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas, Syomin, Vitaly, Bredikhin, Danila, Morozov, Taras & Neretina, Tatiana, 2023, Cryptic species complex or an incomplete speciation? Phylogeographic analysis reveals an intricate Pleistocene history of Priapulus caudatus Lamarck, 1816, pp. 113-130 in Zoologischer Anzeiger 302 on page 126, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcz.2022.11.013, http://zenodo.org/record/10375684
Fig. 9. Divergence time estimates from BEAST analysis for major Priapulus caudatus clades with different calibration scenarios (CS). Dates are in millions of years. Green dots indicate the main divergence nodes, orange dots show Okhotsk clade divergence node. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!