Downloads provided by UsageCounts
These surveys were conducted as part of a three-year research grant generously funded by the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) in 2014. "Measuring Up: Assessing Accuracy of Reported Use and Impact of Digital Repositories" was led by Montana State University, with contributions from the following partners: Association of Research Libraries; OCLC Research; and the University of New Mexico.
This dataset contains the summary results of two surveys, which gathered data about the reporting practices for institutional repositories (IR). The surveys were completed by library directors and IR managers, and questions were asked about strategic importance, content scope, and the methods and mechanisms libraries utilize to evaluate and report on IR use and impact.
institutional repositories; IR; surveys; assessment; reporting; web analytics
institutional repositories; IR; surveys; assessment; reporting; web analytics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 10 | |
| downloads | 9 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts