Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
 View all 2 versions
Claim

Criteria for evaluating the support quality of the OneStop4All (NFDI4Earth Deliverable D2.1.1)

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Project deliverable , Other literature type 11 Dec 2023 English Publisher:NFDI4Earth Community on ZenodoFunded by:DFG | unidentified
Authors: Anders, Ivonne; Braesicke, Peter; Haßler, Sibylle; Kleeberg, Ulrike; Ryan, Marie; Thiemann, Hannes;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10355140 , 10.5281/zenodo.10355141

Criteria for evaluating the support quality of the OneStop4All (NFDI4Earth Deliverable D2.1.1)

Abstract

The OneStop4All (OS4A) is the main access point to all NFDI4Earth resources, and its usability and the quality of the presented content is paramount to the success of the NFDI4Earth. Evaluation of the support quality of the OS4A can be categorised into the usability of the portal website, the subsequent content quality, and the accessible range of topics, and finally the support of the users. In this first version of the deliverable we describe the preliminary work within the NFDI4Earth expert group "User", the derived criteria, common evaluation schemes and the evaluation methods themselves. We recognise that both the OS4A and the evaluation criteria will need to evolve in tandem, based on the feedback we receive from the community once the OS4A is live.

This work has been funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) through the project NFDI4Earth (DFG project no.460036893, https://www.nfdi4earth.de/) within the German National Research Data Infrastructure (NFDI, https://www.nfdi.de/).

Related Organizations
Keywords

NFDI, NFDI4Earth OneStop4All, NFDI4Earth 2Facilitate, NFDI4Earth, NFDI4Earth Deliverable, NFDI4Earth Task Area 2, NFDI4Earth OS4A

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average