Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Conescharellina laevis Silen 1947

Authors: Martino, Emanuela Di;

Conescharellina laevis Silen 1947

Abstract

Conescharellina laevis Silén, 1947a (Fig. 44; Table 39) Conescharellina laevis Silén, 1947a: 42, text-figs 26, 27, pl. 1, figs 9, 10. Material examined. Lectotype (designated here) SMNH-Type-4606a (Fig. 44A–C), Java Sea, Noordwachter Island, Malay Archipelago; 2°56'S, 107°55'E; depth 15–18 m. Leg. C. Aurivillius 1891. Paralectotypes SMNH-Type-4606b (Fig. 44D, E), SMNH-Type-4606c (Fig. 44F), and SMNH-Type-4606d (Fig. 44G), same details as lectotype. Description. Colony small, conical, height 1.45 mm and basal diameter 1.49 mm in the lectotype (Fig. 44A), height 1.67 mm and basal diameter 1.44 mm in the largest paralectotype (Fig. 44D), with 12–16 slightly prominent, narrow, radial costules corresponding with the raised, lateral margins of the autozooids and the rows of interzooidal avicularia, alternating with very shallow, intercostular valleys occupied by autozooidal orifices (Fig. 44A, D, E). Autozooids arranged in alternating radial rows, with 5–6 zooids per row; autozooids of the antapical surface somewhat elliptical, slightly longer than wide (mean L/ W 1.16). Frontal shield raised at the margins and sloping gently towards the centre, smooth, nodular, imperforate except for one or two circular marginal areolar pores (6–8 µm in diameter) proximomedially placed (Fig. 44B, C). Primary orifice depressed in relation to the adjacent surface and surrounded by a smooth band of calcification, 5–15 µm wide, circular (mean L/ W 1.02) with rounded triangular condyles, 6–10 µm long, pointing distally and defining a shallow U-shaped sinus (Fig. 44C); a distal circular to elliptical ooecial pore, 8–12 µm in maximum diameter, associated with each orifice (although sometimes obliterated), outlined by a semicircular to semielliptical rim, 5–10 µm wide, of smooth calcification as that of the orifice, its proximal margin continuous with part of the distal margin of the band of calcification encircling the orifice (Fig. 44B, C, E). Interzooidal avicularia arranged in radial, sinuous rows, with 8–12 avicularia per row, in a way that each zooid is surrounded by six avicularia, one at each corner (two proximally, two mid-laterally and two distally) outlining a hexagon, circular; rostrum semi-circular, obliquely directed either distolaterally or proximolaterally, crossbar complete (Fig. 44B, C, E). Apical surface usually poorly preserved, tubercular, chaotically occupied by kenozooids and avicularia (Fig. 44D, F); antapical surface (Fig. 44G) pitted and with radial rows of avicularia continuous with those of the lateral surface of the colony. Ovicells not observed. Remarks. Of the nine colonies mentioned by Silén (1947a), only four were available in the collection.Although the lot of specimens was catalogued as holotype (i.e. SMNH-Type-4606- holotype), it includes multiple colonies with no univocal designation of the holotype colony neither in Silén (1947a) nor in the physical specimen box. Consequently, the best preserved syntype has been selected as the lectotype (Fig. 44A–C). This specimen seems to correspond in colony size and shape with that figured by Silén (1947a, fig. 9). The absence of a well-developed tubular peristome distinguishes this species from other congeners from Noordwachter Island in the Java Sea, i.e. C. brevirostris and C. longirostris. Five species of Conescharellina were described from Indonesia by Harmer (1957). Conescharellina distalis, C. ovalis, C. papulifera and C. rectilinea all differ in having a well-develop tubular or bisinuate peristome. Conescharellina symmetrica is the most similar to C. laevis in having colonies of similar height and width, in the absence of a tubular peristome, and in the zig-zag arrangement of avicularia outlining distinctly a hexagon (Harmer 1957, p. 97, fig. 72); the main difference between the two species, based on Harmer’s (1957) description, is the shape of the orificial sinus, which is described as subtriangular in C. symmetrica while is U-shaped in C. laevis. Three additional species of Conescharellina are known from the Indo-Pacific: C. catella Canu & Bassler, 1929 differs in having a laterally well-developed peristome (see Hirose 2011, fig. 1); C. crassa (Tenison Woods, 1880) has laterally raised and distally prominent peristomes as well as avicularia with a ligula (Bock & Cook 2004); C. dilatata d’Orbigny, 1852 is characterised by a porous area, interpreted as cancelli by Bock & Cook (2004), on the antapical surface.

Published as part of Martino, Emanuela Di, 2023, Scanning electron microscopy study of Lars Silén's cheilostome bryozoan type specimens in the historical collections of natural history museums in Sweden, pp. 1-106 in Zootaxa 5379 (1) on pages 81-83, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5379.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/10209083

Keywords

Conescharellinidae, Conescharellina laevis, Conescharellina, Gymnolaemata, Animalia, Biodiversity, Bryozoa, Taxonomy, Cheilostomatida

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green