Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Event . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Event . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Event . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

EOSC Compliant PID Implementations - Practical Guidelines for Implementing Best Practices. Webinar, 21 November 2023

Authors: van Lieshout, Natascha; van Horik, René; Hugo, Wim;

EOSC Compliant PID Implementations - Practical Guidelines for Implementing Best Practices. Webinar, 21 November 2023

Abstract

On 21 November 2023 the FAIR-IMPACT project organised a webinar about EOSC Compliant PID Implementations, as a look into how you can adapt existing PID implementation best practices and apply them to your domain and work. The webinar started by providing an overview on PIDs within the EOSC framework, including the PID policy, PID related projects and recent developments. One of these exciting new developments includes a first look at the Compliance Assessment Toolkit (CAT) which strives to encode, record, and query compliance with the EOSC PID policy and more (including TRUST, FAIR, Reproducibility, GDPR, Licenses). Next a series of research lifecycle workflows and how PIDs fit into them were introduced. These research lifecycle workflows clearly flag moments where specific PIDs can be used to improve the FAIRness, trustworthiness and openness of the research products. These research lifecycle workflows can also be used as a guidance tool to write better data management plans and draft clearer institutional policies. The groups was then split into 3 parallel breakout sessions for the interactive portion of the workshop. Each session tested aspects of the current workflows against the CAT to assess compliance with the EOSC PID policy and discuss how this can be used to drive better use and implementation of PIDs. The parallel sessions were focused on datasets, publications and software research lifecycle workflows respectively. Finally there was an open discussion on current blockers to implementing EOSC PID policy compliant PID solutions and potential remedies. Participants were encouraged to reflect on the points discussed for the FAIR IMPACT Open Support Call in January 2024. Goal: To demonstrate concrete tools, policies and developments within the realm of PIDs from the EOSC projects and use that to fuel further innovation through the FAIR IMPACT Open Support Call in January 2024.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average