
Sustainability of FAIR Life Science Resources and Projects: Lessons Learned from EOSC-Life Research Infrastructures This report summarises the key findings regarding sustainable LS resources, based on experiences from the EOSC-Life project. A more detailed description of EOSC-LIFE sustainably experiences and lessons learnt is contained in a companion publication (preprint link1) for which this report will provide an introduction. In the publication, we describe organisational, technical, financial and legal/ethical challenges using lessons from 27 scientific projects selected via open calls, and the work of RI teams. We describe the efficiency of the EOSC-Life support model for sustainable FAIR data management and explore the complex sustainability needs for sensitive- and industry-related data resources. A set of recommendations, which can be applied to other EOSC and data infrastructure projects, are given.
FAIR data, Access to sensitive data, Sustainable access to data, Life Science Research Infrastructures, FAIR tools
FAIR data, Access to sensitive data, Sustainable access to data, Life Science Research Infrastructures, FAIR tools
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
