
Recent advances in deep learning have enabled the creation of natural-sounding synthesised speech. However, attackers have also utilised these tech-nologies to conduct attacks such as phishing. Numerous public datasets have been created to facilitate the development of effective detection models. How-ever, available datasets contain only entirely fake audio; therefore, detection models may miss attacks that replace a short section of the real audio with fake audio. In recognition of this problem, the current paper presents the RFP da-taset, which comprises five distinct audio types: partial fake (PF), audio with noise, voice conversion (VC), text-to-speech (TTS), and real. The data are then used to evaluate several detection models, revealing that the available detec-tion models incur a markedly higher equal error rate (EER) when detecting PF audio instead of entirely fake audio. The lowest EER recorded was 25.42%. Therefore, we believe that creators of detection models must seriously consid-er using datasets like RFP that include PF and other types of fake audio.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Sound (cs.SD), Computer Science - Cryptography and Security, Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS), FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, Cryptography and Security (cs.CR), Computer Science - Sound, Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Audio and Speech Processing
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Sound (cs.SD), Computer Science - Cryptography and Security, Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS), FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, Cryptography and Security (cs.CR), Computer Science - Sound, Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Audio and Speech Processing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
