
This chapter first reviews the basic architectural concepts that underlie the formal theory of Lexical-Functional Grammar. The LFG formalism provides a simple set of devices for describing the common properties of all human languages and the particular properties of individual languages. It postulates two levels of syntactic representation for a sentence, a constituent structure and a functional structure. These are related by a piecewise correspondence that permits the abstract functional structure to be described in terms of configurations of constituent structure phrases. We then survey the mathematical and computational properties of this simple framework. We demonstrate that the recognition/parsing, realization/generation, emptiness, and other more specific decision problems are unsolvable for grammars in the unrestricted LFG formalism. A first set of restrictions guarantees decidability of recognition, realization, and other problems for grammars that are still suitable for linguistic description, but the solutions to these problems in the worst case are computationally impractical. The class of LFG grammars that meet an additional set of restrictions is equivalent to the class of mildly context-sensitive grammars, and the recognition and realization problems for grammars in this class are thus not only decidable but tractable as well.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
