
Developing a novel parallel mechanism design is a complex process, including multiple phases. Designing and analyzing the mechanism's physical prototype is one of the most important phases. The proposed mechanism is novel, with parallel kinematics with actuated translation joins. The considered mechanisms platform has three degrees of freedom (DOF) achieved with three independent kinematic chains representing the connection between the stationary base and the moving platform. The proposed mechanism has numerous connected linkages because of the parallel kinematic construction. The weakest parameter of the mechanisms with parallel kinematics compared to mechanisms with serial kinematics is the shape and size of the workspace. Because of this, the workspace is one of the main parameters in designing a mechanism with parallel kinematics. To achieve the optimal workspace, it is necessary to use the proper joints in the mechanism construction. The mechanism analysis and proper joint selection can be achieved in two ways. The first way is to build the virtual model and experiment on it, and the second is to build the physical prototype. The best way to select the proper joints for the mechanism construction is to compare the analysis results of virtual and physical mechanisms. If the results of comparing virtual and physical prototypes are the same, the physical prototype verifies the mechanism design.
Technical treatment and design: Milana ILIĆ MIĆUNOVIĆ, Miloš RANISAVLJEV, Branko ŠTRBAC, Miodrag HADŽISTEVIĆ
Workspace, Physical prototype, Verification, Parallel mechanism, Chebyshev's linkage
Workspace, Physical prototype, Verification, Parallel mechanism, Chebyshev's linkage
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
