Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Myrmage lii Wang, Mi & Peng 2023, sp. nov.

Authors: Wang, Cheng; Mi, Xiao-Qi; Wang, Wei-Hang; Gan, Jia-Hui; Irfan, Muhammad; Zhong, Yang; Peng, Xian-Jin;

Myrmage lii Wang, Mi & Peng 2023, sp. nov.

Abstract

Myrmage lii Wang, Mi & Peng sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 6C03E9DA-C601-43C1-832E-3EF0D99B5A1E Figs 5–6, 60 Diagnosis The male of Myrmage lii sp. nov. resembles that of M. imbellis (Peckham & Peckham, 1892) in having a very similar palp, but it can be easily distinguished by the following: (1) the chelicera is less than half the carapacae length (Fig. 6D–E), whereas almost as long as carapace in M. imbellis (Benjamin 2015: fig. 8a, c); (2) the RTA has a sub-triangular ventral ramus (Fig. 5B–D), whereas without indistinct ventral ramus in M. imbellis (Benjamin 2015: fig. 10a–c). It also resembles that of M. brevis Xiao, 2002 in having short chelicerae and a similar palp, but it can be distinguished by the following: (1) the sternum is about two times as long as wide (Fig. 6E), whereas about three times as long as wide in M. brevis (Xiao 2002: fig. 6); (2) the dorsal ramus of RTA is anteriorly directed in retrolateral view (Fig. 5C–D), whereas anteroprolaterally directed in M. brevis (Xiao 2002: fig. 3). The female is similar to that of M. dishani in having elongated spermathecae, but it can be easily distinguished by the presence of an epigynal hood, the round atria and by the sclerotized portions of copulatory ducts originating from the anterior edges of the atria and separated from the epigastric groove (Fig. 6A–C), whereas lacking a distinct epigynal hood, with oval atria, and the sclerotized portions of copulatory ducts originating from the posterior margins of the epigyne, and close to the epigastric groove in M. dishani (Benjamin 2015: fig. 6c–d). Etymology The specific name is a patronym in honor of Dr Shuqiang Li, a well-known arachnologist; noun (name) in genitive case. Type material Holotype CHINA • ♂; Yunnan, Nanjian County, Lingbao Mountain National Forest Park; 24°46.02′ N, 100°31.19′ E; 2285 m a.s.l.; 12 Aug. 2015; C. Wang et al. leg.; TRU-JS 0071. Paratypes CHINA • 12 ♀♀; same collection data as for holotype; TRU-JS 0072–0083. Description Male (holotype) MEASUREMENTS. Total length 3.73. Carapace 1.64 long, 1.03 wide. Abdomen 2.01 long, 0.88 wide. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.34, ALE 0.18, PLE 0.17, AERW 0.98, PERW 1.05, EFL 0.77. Legs: I 3.66 (1.10, 0.50, 1.10, 0.59, 0.37), II 2.80 (0.80, 0.45, 0.70, 0.51, 0.34), III 3.09 (0.88, 0.43, 0.73, 0.68, 0.37), IV 4.39 (1.32, 0.50, 1.15, 1.01, 0.41). HABITUS. Carapace red-brown to dark brown, covered with sparse white setae, with elevated, sub-square cephalic region (Fig. 6D). Chelicerae stubby, with five teeth on both margins (Fig. 6G). Sternum about two times as long as wide (Fig. 6E). Legs yellow to red-brown, with ventral macroseta on patellae I, and four and two pairs of ventral macrosetae on tibiae and metatarsi I, respectively. Abdomen elongated, dorsum brown to red-brown, covered by big scutum, with a pair of mediolateral white stripes formed by setae and followed by indistinct, transverse, yellow streak; venter dark brown (Fig. 6D–E). PALP. Tibia longer than wide in retrolateral view, with short, tapered PTA rather pointed apically; RTA broadened anteromedially and bifurcated into sub-triangular ventral ramus and tapered dorsal ramus curved towards bulb distally in ventral view; bulb almost round; embolus broad, flat, coiled about two circles, with pointed distal end (Fig. 5). Female (paratype, TRU-JS 0072) MEASUREMENTS. Total length 5.14. Carapace 1.91 long, 1.05 wide. Abdomen 2.68 long, 1.36 wide. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.34, ALE 0.18, PLE 0.17, AERW 1.04, PERW 1.14, EFL 0.76. Legs: I 3.60 (1.10, 0.55, 0.95, 0.54, 0.46), II 2.81 (0.80, 0.43, 0.75, 0.49, 0.34), III 3.20 (0.90, 0.43, 0.80, 0.73, 0.34), IV 4.65 (1.34, 0.55, 1.25, 1.07, 0.44). HABITUS. Similar to that of male except paler in color and without dorsal abdominal scutum (Fig. 6F). EPIGYNE. Slightly longer than wide, with sub-triangular hood located at middle of posterior portion; atria paired, round, posterolaterally located; copulatory openings indistinct; sclerotized portions of copulatory ducts strongly curved; spermathecae elongated, touching, slightly broadened distally; fertilization ducts lamellar, extended transversely (Fig. 6A–C). Distribution China (Yunnan) (Fig. 60).

Published as part of Wang, Cheng, Mi, Xiao-Qi, Wang, Wei-Hang, Gan, Jia-Hui, Irfan, Muhammad, Zhong, Yang & Peng, Xian-Jin, 2023, Notes on twenty-nine species of jumping spiders from South China (Araneae: Salticidae), pp. 1-91 in European Journal of Taxonomy 902 on pages 11-14, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.902.2319, http://zenodo.org/record/10115594

Related Organizations
Keywords

Arthropoda, Salticidae, Myrmage lii, Arachnida, Animalia, Araneae, Biodiversity, Myrmage, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average