
In this use case, we intend to discuss potential FAIR metrics for the Earth and Environmental Sciences community (here: solid earth and oceans excluding atmosphere and biosphere) in collaboration with projects such as FAIR-EASE, Blue-Cloud and ENVRI-FAIR. For this purpose, we want to analyse the FAIR habits of this community to find out if there are similarities in the use of e.g. identifiers, standards and vocabularies that justify deriving their own FAIR metrics from the existing FAIRsFAIR metrics. We will investigate existing technical interfaces for metadata exchange and use FAIR implementation profiles of relevant data archives.Initiatives such as GEOSS or OGC have contributed in recent years to the fact that the level of standardization of earth and environmental science data repositories is generally quite high. In addition, there are a number of ongoing EU projects dealing with the implementation of the FAIR principles in this community. However, the Earth science community is quite diverse and there is no common understanding of FAIR so far. Using the example of some established research infrastructures from different fields of earth and environmental sciences, we will first investigate how homogeneous the use of FAIR implementation resources such as metadata standards or vocabularies is and try to develop metrics for the community or for appropriate parts of this community.
Earth and environmental sciences, Metadata, FAIR-IMPACT, Metadata & Ontologies, Metadata & Ontologies, PID, Ontologies, Interoperability, FAIR
Earth and environmental sciences, Metadata, FAIR-IMPACT, Metadata & Ontologies, Metadata & Ontologies, PID, Ontologies, Interoperability, FAIR
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
