
Modeling temporal information in cultural heritage knowledge graphs is essential to understand history, society and the world. However, due to the binary nature of RDF predicates, representing time in RDF is a challenge. This work addresses the challenge and explores various approaches for integrating time into knowledge graphs. In particular, the work aims at answering key research questions, such as best practices for temporal representation in RDF, crucial requirements in the cultural heritage context, and evaluating RDF extensions for modeling time. Additionally, it is investigated how RDF can reason over temporal relationships and how the new insights can be used to develop a lightweight and intuitive approach for modeling time in RDF based on domain requirements. Fundamentally, the research argues for embracing the persistence of temporality in KGs, as it is crucial for understanding our changing heritage, recognising the influence of the past on the present, and shaping a knowledgeable future.
info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/330, 330, ddc:330, Economics
info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/330, 330, ddc:330, Economics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
