Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Workflow for microbiological diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis combining a molecular assay as first-line with reflective stool culture

Authors: Munoz-Davila, M.J.; Candel-Pérez, C.; Vicente, M.R.; Piqueras, M.; Artero, J.M.;

Workflow for microbiological diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis combining a molecular assay as first-line with reflective stool culture

Abstract

Conventional microbiological methods for bacterial enteric disease diagnosis are time-consuming, labour intensive and provide low sensitivity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of a new diagnosis strategy which replaces traditional stool culture with a molecular detection using the BD MAX™ System (BD Life Sciences, Sparks, Maryland, United States) as first-line assay together with reflective culture. A total of 1.590 specimens were prospectively requested for stool culture. The molecular detection included the BD MAX enteric bacterial panel together with the BD MAX extended enteric bacterial panel (BDM GIP) performed simultaneously on the same stool specimen. In 18.8% of specimens (176 of the 936 valid samples) there was one or more than one target positive with the following percent positivity: 9.7% Campylobacter spp., 5.7% Salmonella spp., 1.3% Shiga toxin genes (stx1/stx2), 1.2% Shigella spp./enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC), 1% Yersinia enterocolitica, 1% Vibrio spp. (V. vulnificus/V. parahaemolyticus/V. cholerae), 0.3% Plesiomonas shigelloides, and 0.2% Enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) enterotoxin LT/ST genes. Positive reflective stool culture noted a correlation of 69.5% with the molecular test, missing 23.9% and 15.4% in the cases of Campylobacter spp., and Salmonella spp., respectively. In conclusion, this clinical study demonstrated very good performance of the BDM GIP. The performance and ease of use may provide advantages to many laboratories, improving the detection of bacterial stool pathogens and time to reporting results.

Keywords

bacterial gastroenteritis, molecular detection, BD MAX™ System

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities