
Modern research institutions have a growing data challenge, and a key step in addressing it is knowing what institutions hold. The ARDC-funded, Institutional Underpinnings Extension Project: RDM Business Intelligence and Reporting provides a case study on developing an approach to the systematic characterisation and reporting of research data properties to enable strategic decision-making. This project is closely related to the Institutional Underpinnings Extension Project: Retention and Disposal of Research Data, which has focused on the "end-of-life" challenge for research data (Final report: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10076891). The institutional underpinnings extension project was supported by the Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC). ARDC is enabled by the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS). The project was principally carried out by project partners: UNSW Sydney (Chief Investigator), The University of Sydney and University of Technology Sydney, with support from the broader community in the Steering Committee, Working Group, Workshops, and Birds of a Feather session at the eResearch conference Australasia 2023.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
