Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The Rise of Robotic Children: Implications for Family, Caregiving, and Society

Authors: Dr.A.Shaji George; A.S.Hovan George;

The Rise of Robotic Children: Implications for Family, Caregiving, and Society

Abstract

Globally, declining birth rates coupled with aging populations have created a caregiving gap as smaller families struggle to care for growing numbers of elderly relatives. Roboticists have responded by developing robotic children—socially intelligent, humanoid machines designed for companionship, caregiving, and emotional bonds with humans. This paper examines the rise of robotic children and its profound implications for concepts of family, caregiving responsibilities, and human-robot relationships. The background covers demographic data showing low fertility rates in most industrialized nations, leaving smaller families to provide eldercare. With fewer children, aging individuals often lack family caregivers, spurring technology companies to engineer robotic children to fill caregiving roles. Key issues analyzed include impacts on family structure if robotic children assume child roles, ethical dilemmas of robot caregivers, and psychological risks of bonding with non-humanoid machines. As robotic children become increasingly sophisticated in providing social-emotional support and handling caregiving tasks, they may alter fundamental notions of parenthood and family relationships. Yet important questions remain about their appropriateness and capabilities as surrogate caregivers or children. Forming attachments to robotic companions also raises alarms about exploiting innate human emotions and the need to set boundaries on human-robot relationships. The use of robotic children potentially undermines social values around family caregiving and responsibilities. Overall, the rise of highly advanced, human-like robotic children portends a transformation in how we conceive of family units, provide care for older generations, and interact with artificial intelligence. More research is urgently needed to guide policies on the applications of robotic children and prevent unintended consequences for society. A thoughtful debate must ensue to determine if and how this emerging technology can be integrated into family life in an ethical manner, augmenting but not replacing the irreplaceable bonds of human care and connection.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Robotics, Child Development, Elder Care, Social Bonds, Ethics, Human-Robot Interaction, Future of Families, Robotic Children.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Green