Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2023
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2023
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

D3.4 Methodological framework for intersectional DEI policy case studies

Authors: Van Laer, Koen; Zanoni, Patrizia; Beeckmans, Joanna;

D3.4 Methodological framework for intersectional DEI policy case studies

Abstract

This document serves as a practical guide for carrying out the exploratory case studies on intersectional policies. In total, ten in-depth case studies are conducted in order to generate insight in the nature and characteristics, the governance, design and implementation of effective intersectional GEP's and DEI policies in Research & Innovation (R&I) organisations and institutions, as well as on relevant organisational and extra-organisational factors affecting this. Hasselt University will coordinate the case study selection, set up the methodology, and conduct four case studies. Radboud University and FUOC will each conduct one case study and ZRC SAZU and Fraunhofer will each conduct two additional case studies. These case studies are part of INSPIRE: European Centre of Excellence on Inclusive Gender Equality in Research & Innovation which aims to "develop innovative tools and knowledge to address intersecting inequalities across the public and private sectors and geographical regions in Europe" ("INSPIRE" 2023). The case studies are of high relevance for the project because they contribute to form the evidence-based of the Knowledge and Support Hub (KSH) 3 on Intersectionality led by UHasselt and Notus and will lead to two deliverables: D3.4 Methodological framework for intersectional DEI policy case studies and D3.5 Report on barriers & facilitating factors of effective DEI policies. However, as they allow for the theorization and operationalization of what an intersectional Gender Equality Plan (GEP) could look like, the case studies are also of relevance more broadly for Research and Innovation (R&I) organisations in Europe and beyond. The focus on intersectionality reflects the increasing recognition of the importance of ensuring that those who experience multiple, intersecting forms of inequalities and disadvantages do not remain invisible in the design and implementation of equality policies (Garcia and Zajicek 2022). In Horizon Europe, the 9th Framework for Research and Innovation (R&I) of the European Commission, an intersectional approach to gender equality has become a main priority of their Gender Equality Strategy 2020-2025 and their Strategic Plan for Research & Innovation 2020-2024 (European Commission 2020a; 2020b).

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average