Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Using Machine-Learning to Facilitate Data Extraction for Human Health Chemical Assessments: Protocol for a case application

Authors: Michelle Angrish; Kristina A. Thayer; Brittany Schulz; Artur Nowak; Amanda Persad; Allison L. Phillips; Glenn Rice; +9 Authors

Using Machine-Learning to Facilitate Data Extraction for Human Health Chemical Assessments: Protocol for a case application

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) methods including natural language processing, active learning, and large language models are expected to provide workflow advances to reduce risk assessors' time and effort while maintaining the accuracy necessary to meet demand for chemical assessments. A growing suite of modular software applications that integrate AI methods and leverage human-in-the-loop workflows are making operationalization of these advancements feasible. The case application in this protocol supports development of a Provisional Peer-Reviewed Toxicity Value (PPRTV) assessment for 1,3-dinitrobenzene (1,3-DNB). The protocol describes methods to develop a literature inventory and systematic evidence map (SEM) for 1,3-DNB. Along with typical systematic review methods, the protocol applies an active learning approach to screen records at the title and abstract level using AI methods. While active learning has been a routine method used to reduce the resources required to screen records at the title and abstract level, automated processes for data extraction with user verification have evolved slowly. The slow evolution of AI for data extraction continues to be a challenge primarily because the resources required to develop appropriate training datasets for model development are limited, leading to immature models with poor performance, or the lack of models for many domain-specific data extraction fields. This protocol showcases how software applications like Dextr can be used to address both challenges with the potential to make progress toward a modern workflow stack including data extraction.

Keywords

systematic evidence map, machine learning, systematic review, FAIR principles, toxicity, hazard identification, artificial intelligence

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 20
    download downloads 8
  • 20
    views
    8
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
20
8
Green
Related to Research communities