
This article aims to present the system of compulsory licensing resulting from the TRIPS Agreement, with particular emphasis on the impact of the Doha Declaration of 2001 and the Geneva Declaration of 2022. The principles of compulsory licensing contained in art. 31 of the Agreement and the possibility of exemptions from some of them thanks to the Doha Declaration, as well as the proposed changes in their application resulting from the Geneva Declaration was indicated. In addition, the case of granting a compulsory license in the territory of Canada in the interest of Rwanda was mentioned, which was the first and so far the last example of using the TRIPS compulsory licensing system in practice. The analysis of the above issues makes it possible to determine whether the described system is properly regulated or whether it requires further work and modifications.
TRIPS, patent, compulsory license, industrial property law, COVID-19, Doha Declaration, Geneva Declaration, intellectual property
TRIPS, patent, compulsory license, industrial property law, COVID-19, Doha Declaration, Geneva Declaration, intellectual property
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
