Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
DRYAD
Dataset . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Data from: Tropical tree size-frequency distributions from airborne lidar

Authors: Ferraz, Antonio; Saatchi, Sassan; Longo, Marcos; Clark, David;

Data from: Tropical tree size-frequency distributions from airborne lidar

Abstract

Tropical rainforest canopies, where stems and crowns reside, are hotspots of biological diversity, mediate the global biochemical processes and are the interface between organic nature and the atmosphere. Ecosystem functions such as growth, competition and mortality, depend on the spatial arrangement of tree crowns that varies significantly across forest types and disturbance gradients. The exact nature and function of tropical tree canopies are not well known. Field inventories often focus on measuring the horizontal component of the canopy (tree diameter and species identification) and rarely measure tree height or crown size. Remote sensing airborne lidar (light detection and ranging) is considered a complementary method to circumvent the difficulty of field techniques in measuring forest canopies, with recognized ability to estimate canopy height and vegetation vertical profiles. A recent lidar-based method (adaptive mean shift, AMS3D) shown improved capabilities to deal with the complexity of tropical forest and to provide spatial explicit measurements of crown morphology and packing by modeling individual trees. Here, we report tree-level forest inventory (field and LiDAR) over nine 1 ha forest plots in the La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica. The field inventory includes stem location (tree height > 10m), tree diameter, tree height and wood density. Crown radii measurements for a tree subsample (n=285) were used to derive local tree allometry. The lidar forest inventory includes the point clouds measurements over the 1 ha plots with an additional attribute to cluster the individual points into tree crowns. The lidar tree crowns were modeled to estimate tree location, tree height, crown depth, crown area, crown volume and crown surface. Additionally, we provide tree-level LiDAR forest inventory for 45360 plots (1 ha) distributed over old-growth, selectively-logged, secondary and swamp forests. The field inventories have been compared and show good agreement in terms of stem number density, size-frequency distributions (stem diameter, tree height), basal area and aboveground biomass.

The methods used to derive the field and lidar forest inventory are described in Clark DB, Ferraz A, Clark DA, Kellner JR, Letcher SG, Saatchi S (2019) Diversity, distribution and dynamics of large trees across an old-growth lowland tropical rain forest landscape. PLoS ONE 14(11): e0224896. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224896 and Ferraz A, Saatchi S, Longo M, Clark DB (2020) Tropical tree size-frequency distributions from airborne lidar. Ecological Applications respectively. 

Keywords

basal area, individual tree crown, tree height, crown size, La Selva Biological Station, airborne laser scanning, AMS3D, size-frequency distribution, forest inventory

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 23
    download downloads 20
  • 23
    views
    20
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
23
20